Sex‐Based Occupational Segregation in U.S. State Bureaucracies, 1987–97

Abstract

Sex-Based Occupational Segregation in U.S. State Bureaucracies, 1987-97 Is the extent of sex-based occupational segregation in U.S. state bureaucracies related to agency policy missions? Drawing on arguments by Lowi (1985), we contend that levels of sex-based occupational segregation in state bureaucracies vary depending on whether an agency's policy mission is distributive, regulatory, or redistributive. We employ data on the distribution of administrative and professional employees by sex in several types of state agencies across all 50 states for 1987-97. Our findings indicate high levels of occupational segregation among administrative cadres in agencies with distributive and regulatory policy commitments; however, professional workforces in these agencies have become less gender segregated over time. We find no evidence of occupational segregation among administrative and professional workforces in redistributive agencies. We argue that researchers need to examine the relationship between glass walls and other kinds of sex-based employment impediments, such as glass ceilings.

The Experience of Gender Change in Public Sector Organizations

“…Mac an Ghaill (1994), researching a state secondary school in the UK, shows not only multiple constructions of masculinity, but how these are connected to patterns of sexuality and to the organizational routines of different groups of participants. An important research programme in the US has documented statistically the differing patterns of occupational segregation in different types of public sector agency (Kerr et al ., 2002; Newman, 1995).…”

Exploring the Antecedents of the Gender Pay Gap in U.S. Higher Education

“…Most public administration literature on the antecedents of the gender pay gap has focused on sociodemographic and human capital factors (Alkadry and Tower ; Lewis and Oh ; Naff ). When it comes to organizational factors, many empirical studies have been limited in their examination of organizational factors, including agency type and sector (Choi ; Guy and Newman ; Kerr, Miller, and Reid ; Sneed ). This article attempts to fill this gap by examining the gender pay gap among full‐time assistant professors in U.S. public and private nonprofit research institutions, where these disparities have been salient for several years (Bellas ; Curtis ; Umbach ).…”

Public Agencies, Gendered Organizations: The future of gender studies in public management

“…Lewis (1994), studying federal-level whitecollar jobs, establishes a link between agency mission and the extent of occupational segregation by gender in an agency, where women are concentrated in clerical and technical positions, with few opportunities for advancement. Bethany Sneed (2007) also finds a link between agency type -distributive, redistributive, regulatory, or generaland occupational segregation by gender and pay disparities by gender on the state level, 864 Public Management Review affirming Kerr et al (2002). Cornwell and Kellough (1994) do not separate federal agencies by Lowi's typology, but rather, find greater shares of female employment across the board in agencies with social equity functions, such as 'education, public welfare, social insurance, housing and community development, and social security and Medicare ' (1994, p. 269), which are Lowian redistributive agencies (Newman 1994(Newman , 1995.…”