2009
DOI: 10.1080/10714410802629227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex as Development: Curriculum, Pedagogy and Critical Inquiry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to UNESCO (2009), good sexuality education develops learners holistically and equips them with skills to negotiate their relationships with others. On the other hand, Janssen (2009) argues that for sexuality education to be good, it should critique norms and address all sexualities positively. This would allow for schools and communities to challenge oppressive and negative sexuality norms that privilege certain sexualities over others, hence creating safe spaces for learners to construct their sexual identities without prejudice.…”
Section: What Is Comprehensive Sexuality Education?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to UNESCO (2009), good sexuality education develops learners holistically and equips them with skills to negotiate their relationships with others. On the other hand, Janssen (2009) argues that for sexuality education to be good, it should critique norms and address all sexualities positively. This would allow for schools and communities to challenge oppressive and negative sexuality norms that privilege certain sexualities over others, hence creating safe spaces for learners to construct their sexual identities without prejudice.…”
Section: What Is Comprehensive Sexuality Education?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If and when sex is talked about in U.S. public schools, the only pedagogical conversation that is usually legally permitted is one in which the terror of desire is propagated via the proliferation of fear. Thus, the "official knowledge" of the sex curriculum is restricted to health education classes where students learn about the biology, the methodology, and the epidemiology (sexual diseases) of intimate sexual activity (Allen, 2008;Ashcraft, 2006;Farrelly, O'Brien, & Prain, 2007;Fine & McClelland, 2006;Janssen, 2009;Lamb, 2010). In her 1988 article in the Harvard Educational Review, Michelle Fine identified the three most pervasive discourses in the sex education curriculum: sexuality as violence; sexuality as victimization; and sexuality as individual morality.…”
Section: Abstinence In/by Inclusive Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the rise of therapy culture around sex (that is, bringing sex into the public eye where popular stars make self-disclosures and the discourse around sex centers around issues of health and happiness) required teachers to teach 'healthy' sex behaviors and discourage 'unhealthy' sex behaviors (Furedi, 2003;Janssen, 2009) rather than right and wrong. Of course, many who design curricula have ethical principles in mind that they hope teens will follow.…”
Section: Ethics-based Sex Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a growing body of work that discusses sex education related to issues of 'normality' and power (Janssen, 2009). Those who write about what a democratic sex education could look like point specifically to inclusion as a key component.…”
Section: Ethics-based Sex Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation