2009
DOI: 10.1179/146431509790559534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex and Relationships Education: Potential and Challenges Perceived by Teachers of the Deaf

Abstract: Providing children who are deaf [1]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Societal attitudes and assumptions about disability continue to disempower disabled children (assigning low status and encouraging passivity) and impact upon their confidence and self-esteem when it comes to disclosure (Sobsey 1994;Briggs 2006). A lack of effective sex and relationships education for deaf children and children with special educational needs, as well as a lack of personal safety skills education for disabled children have also been identified as barriers to protection (Suter et al 2009;Franklin et al 2015). Other concerns include a reluctance to believe that disabled children are abused, and a minimisation of harm done (Westcott & Cross 1996), myths in relation to the sexual abuse of disabled children (Marchant 1991;Taylor et al 2015a) and the possibility that a child's impairment could mask child protection concerns (Murray & Osborne 2009;Ofsted 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Societal attitudes and assumptions about disability continue to disempower disabled children (assigning low status and encouraging passivity) and impact upon their confidence and self-esteem when it comes to disclosure (Sobsey 1994;Briggs 2006). A lack of effective sex and relationships education for deaf children and children with special educational needs, as well as a lack of personal safety skills education for disabled children have also been identified as barriers to protection (Suter et al 2009;Franklin et al 2015). Other concerns include a reluctance to believe that disabled children are abused, and a minimisation of harm done (Westcott & Cross 1996), myths in relation to the sexual abuse of disabled children (Marchant 1991;Taylor et al 2015a) and the possibility that a child's impairment could mask child protection concerns (Murray & Osborne 2009;Ofsted 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the specific context of Ontario, Canada, while a significant majority of parents advocate for sexuality education in schools [90], the topic remains ensnared in public contention and political discourse [91]. Such debates often overshadow the pressing needs of students with disabilities, sidelining their experiences, interests, and challenges related to gender and sexuality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are subjects that their hearing counterparts might inadvertently assimilate through mainstream media and pop culture [89]. Research underscores the need to prepare educators in d/Deaf schools to impart sexuality education in a way that is cognizant of the limitations inherent in mainstream educational settings for d/Deaf and hard-of-hearing students [88][89][90].…”
Section: Further Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well, it is important to have explicit conversations with d/Deaf and hard-of-hearing children about HIV/AIDS, STIs, and other everyday conversations that children who are hearing might be exposed to through pop culture and media that is targeted towards those who are hearing [63]. Further research notes the specific need to prepare teachers who are employed at deaf schools to teach and address sexuality education while acknowledging the limitations of approaches in mainstreamed school settings for students who are d/Deaf and/or hard-of-hearing [64].…”
Section: Further Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%