Sex Ambiguity in Early Modern Common Law (1629–1787)

Abstract

Prior to the modern understanding of sex as fundamentally biological, a person’s sex status—that is, whether they were male or female—was largely a legal issue. How was this legal fact established in cases of doubt? To answer that question, this article tells the story of the regulation of cases of doubtful sex (the cases of people who were then referred to as hermaphrodites) between 1629 and 1787 in England and Colonial America. Trials of doubtful sex from this period show that, rather than being based on a single piece of evidence (such as genital appearance), determining a person’s sex required a rich and context-sensitive evaluation by witnesses and juries. However, toward the end of the eighteenth century, scientific and medical authorities gradually sought to classify hermaphrodites according to their “true sex” and to remove any doubt from that classification. Ultimately, this article demonstrates that the early modern common law tradition did not conceptualize sex as purely binary and did not hinge on medical opinions throughout most of the eighteenth century. These findings highlight the continuous engagement of courts in actively shaping the meaning and ontology of sex rather than merely reflecting it in their decisions.

Opening the Gender Box: Legibility Dilemmas and Gender Data Collection on U.S. State Government Forms

“…Queering the gender box means resisting the law's historical role in medicalizing sex and gender and classifying people by fiat (Sudai 2021). But beyond that, it could take many forms.…”

‘A woman and now a man’: The legitimation of sex-assignment surgery in the United States (1849–1886)

“…The common law tradition classified hermaphrodites as males or females using a dominancy rule: '[a] hermaphrodite is classed with male or female according to the predominance of the sexual organs' (Bracton and Twiss, 2012: 35). The little-known case law from early modern England and colonial America indicates that sex at this time was adjudicated in court, predominantly using juries and witnesses (Sudai, 2021).…”

Of mermaids and monsters: Transgender history and the boundaries of the human in eighteenth‐ and early‐nineteenth‐century Britain

“…Whilst Douglas insisted that they were female, a jury at the Old Bailey in which Boon's 'wife', Katherine Jones was accused of bigamy accepted that Boon was a 'hermaphrodite' (and 'monster' as Jones attested) and thereby acquitted Jones. 82 Although natural scientists and physicians decried the 'superstitions' of the populace for their belief in 'hermaphrodites', as with mermaid sightings they also relied on popular reports and exhibitions to gain awareness of, and access to, ambiguous bodies. This was certainly the case with the display of a person, referred to alternately as 'the African hermaphrodite' and 'the Angolan hermaphrodite' displayed in London in the 1740s.…”