Evolution and Diversity of Sex Ratio 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-1402-8_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Allocation and Pseudoarrhenotoky in Phytoseiid Mites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work with parasitoids has found evidence that olfactory cues left by other females lead to sex ratio adjustment in Trissolcus grandis (Kochetova 1978) and Telenomus remus (van Welzen & Waage 1987) but not in N. vitripennis (Wylie 1976) or Spalangia cameroni (King 1989). A role for similar cues was suggested in the mite Phytoseiulus persimilis , where females lay a less-biased sex ratio on a patch if it was previously visited by another female (Sabelis & Nagelkerke 1993). However, the cue in these experiments could have been the eggs laid by the previous female, as occurs with N. vitripennis (Werren 1980; Shuker & West 2004; Shuker et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous work with parasitoids has found evidence that olfactory cues left by other females lead to sex ratio adjustment in Trissolcus grandis (Kochetova 1978) and Telenomus remus (van Welzen & Waage 1987) but not in N. vitripennis (Wylie 1976) or Spalangia cameroni (King 1989). A role for similar cues was suggested in the mite Phytoseiulus persimilis , where females lay a less-biased sex ratio on a patch if it was previously visited by another female (Sabelis & Nagelkerke 1993). However, the cue in these experiments could have been the eggs laid by the previous female, as occurs with N. vitripennis (Werren 1980; Shuker & West 2004; Shuker et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Our aim in this study was to test the importance of several possible cues used by females. In our first two experiments we tested whether females produce less female-biased sex ratios in response to two cues that might suggest a higher likeli-hood that other females will lay eggs on a patch: (1) previous encounters with other females (Wylie 1976; Strand 1988; King & D’Souza 2004; and (2) olfactory cues from other females (Wylie 1976; Kochetova 1978; van Welzen & Waage 1987; Sabelis & Nagelkerke 1993). In our final two experiments we investigated how females adjust their offspring sex ratio in response to the interaction between the number of females laying eggs on a patch and patch size (Waage 1982).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%