2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40909-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex Affects the Relationship Between Third Party Punishment and Cooperation

Abstract: Prosocial third-party punishment (3PP) is a punitive behavior against antisocial individuals, which might explain extended cooperativeness in humans. 3PP shows sexual dimorphism, being more frequent in men than in women. We studied whether sexually dimorphic features related to sexual hormones during development (facial dimorphism and 2D:4D) influence the tendency to engage in 3PP in a sample of 511 women and 328 men. After playing a Prisoner’s Dilemma, participants had to decide whether to penalize the defect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Zheng et al (2017) found that males rejected more unfair offers in the high- versus low-pressure context than females in an ultimatum game. Similarly, Rodriguez-Ruiz et al (2019) found gender differences in the tendency to engage in Prosocial third-party punishment, with cooperating men being more likely to punish than cooperative women. This finding suggested that the way males and females engage in third-party punishment under acute stress could be different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For example, Zheng et al (2017) found that males rejected more unfair offers in the high- versus low-pressure context than females in an ultimatum game. Similarly, Rodriguez-Ruiz et al (2019) found gender differences in the tendency to engage in Prosocial third-party punishment, with cooperating men being more likely to punish than cooperative women. This finding suggested that the way males and females engage in third-party punishment under acute stress could be different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The sample includes 935 men and 900 women who have participated in different experiments since 2010, some whose results have been published and others are pending publication. The sample includes right hand scans of 147 men from Sanchez-Pages and Turiegano (2010) [ 119 ] and the right and left hand scans of 474 women and 328 men from Rodriguez-Ruiz et al (2019) [ 120 ] (with the exception of 37 women hand pairs whose original images could not be found). We included data already published in the study because this makes data dredging impossible in that subsample [ 121 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this population we studied whether the difference in 2D:4D between men and women is due to allometric issues, and also the relationship between 2D:4D and handedness measured with two different methods and the relationship between 2D:4D and sexual orientation. Some of these data have been previously published [ 119 , 120 ]. Reanalysing previously published data has the advantage that it prevents intentional data selection [ 121 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 That second experiment was on cooperation and third party punishment. Results are reported in Rodriguez-Ruiz et al (2019), although subjects in the present study who took part in that experiment constituted a small part of the overall sample. For the purpose of that second experiment, we collected data on upper body strength, fluctuating asymmetry, self-perceived attractiveness and sexual orientation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%