2000
DOI: 10.1186/cc961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severity evaluation in acute pancreatitis: the role of SOFA score and general severity scores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40 Even with its limitations, a study of 49 patients found that generic measures of disease severity like the APACHE II Score were superior to disease-specific scoring systems in predicting mortality. 41 For instance, the Ranson score was found to be a poor predictor of severity in a meta-analysis of 110 studies. 42 The organ failure-based criteria for the prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis are taken, in part, from the modified Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score 43 presented by Banks and colleagues 44 in their revision of the Atlanta Classification.…”
Section: 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Even with its limitations, a study of 49 patients found that generic measures of disease severity like the APACHE II Score were superior to disease-specific scoring systems in predicting mortality. 41 For instance, the Ranson score was found to be a poor predictor of severity in a meta-analysis of 110 studies. 42 The organ failure-based criteria for the prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis are taken, in part, from the modified Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score 43 presented by Banks and colleagues 44 in their revision of the Atlanta Classification.…”
Section: 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 11 Ranson criteria, four are directly related to fluid resuscitation (urea, net fluid sequestration, base deficit, and decreased hematocrit) and are independent predictors of mortality (7). In a report of 49 patients with acute pancreatitis, generic measures of disease severity such as the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II or Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score were superior to diseasespecific scoring systems in predicting mortality (8). These scoring systems describe patients in the first 24 -48 hrs after their presentation.…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 97%