Abstract:Aim: Changes to the extent and severity of wildfires driven by anthropogenic climate change are predicted to have compounding negative consequences for ecological communities. While there is evidence that severe weather events like drought impact amphibian communities, the effects of wildfire on such communities are not well understood. The impact of wildfire on amphibian communities and species is likely to vary, owing to the diversity of their life-history traits. However, no previous research has identified… Show more
“…Furthermore, Beranek et al (2023) found that amphibian metacommunities in the southern regions of NSW were negatively impacted by high fire severity, whereas an effect was not detected in the northern region. cracks or within reeds such as Lomandra spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, rangerestricted species that occur in remote areas are less well sampled via the FrogID project and other citizen science projects. Other survey methods, such as targeted scientific surveys or passive acoustic monitoring (Beranek et al 2023), may be necessary to elucidate the effects of fire on these species. This may explain why, despite considerable data collection, there were still relatively few sites with high fire impact (n = 11; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these errors are seen when distinguishing between low-and moderate-severity fires, and between high-and extreme-severity fires (White and Gibson 2022). Despite these potential uncertainties, FESM was the most logistically feasible dataset for our large-scale analysis and has been the preferred choice in numerous remote-sensing studies (Bilney et al 2022;Beranek et al 2023;Law et al 2022Law et al , 2023. More information regarding the FESM dataset can be found here https://datasets.seed.nsw.gov.…”
Context Fire has played an integral role in regulating patterns of biodiversity for millions of years. However, anthropogenic disturbance and climate change has altered fire activity – driving increases in both fire severity and scale. The effect fire now has on the persistence of biodiversity is poorly known, especially for frogs. Studies examining frog responses to fire usually have small sample sizes, focus upon small geographic areas and are based on low-severity fires, which can mean results are not applicable to high-severity fires, such as those expected under future climate change. Aims Our aims were to examine (1) persistence of frog species, measured by species richness, up to 18 months post-fire, and (2) the effects of varying fire severity on frog species richness and recovery, where we expected higher fire severity to lead to lower species richness after fire. Methods Using large-scale citizen science data from the Australian Museum’s FrogID project, coupled with remotely sensed fire data, we present a spatially and taxonomically broad analysis examining post-fire recovery responses for Australian frog species after the 2019/2020 ‘Black Summer’ bushfires. Key results We reveal no overall decrease in the species richness of Australian frogs both in the short- and long-term post-fire. Furthermore, species richness did not decline with increasing fire severity. Instead, species richness and its response to fire was highly site-specific. Conclusions We provide evidence that widespread and common Australian frog species have persisted post-fire in most sites and concluded that this is potentially due to their ability to shelter from fire adequately and/or La Niña-driven high rainfall offering conditions conducive to breeding activity and persistence. Implications We show how citizen science provides critical data for conservation, especially in response to unprecedented disturbance events, such as the 2019/2020 megafires. Our research also highlights the need for ongoing and targeted scientific monitoring, especially for less common or threatened species.
“…Furthermore, Beranek et al (2023) found that amphibian metacommunities in the southern regions of NSW were negatively impacted by high fire severity, whereas an effect was not detected in the northern region. cracks or within reeds such as Lomandra spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, rangerestricted species that occur in remote areas are less well sampled via the FrogID project and other citizen science projects. Other survey methods, such as targeted scientific surveys or passive acoustic monitoring (Beranek et al 2023), may be necessary to elucidate the effects of fire on these species. This may explain why, despite considerable data collection, there were still relatively few sites with high fire impact (n = 11; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these errors are seen when distinguishing between low-and moderate-severity fires, and between high-and extreme-severity fires (White and Gibson 2022). Despite these potential uncertainties, FESM was the most logistically feasible dataset for our large-scale analysis and has been the preferred choice in numerous remote-sensing studies (Bilney et al 2022;Beranek et al 2023;Law et al 2022Law et al , 2023. More information regarding the FESM dataset can be found here https://datasets.seed.nsw.gov.…”
Context Fire has played an integral role in regulating patterns of biodiversity for millions of years. However, anthropogenic disturbance and climate change has altered fire activity – driving increases in both fire severity and scale. The effect fire now has on the persistence of biodiversity is poorly known, especially for frogs. Studies examining frog responses to fire usually have small sample sizes, focus upon small geographic areas and are based on low-severity fires, which can mean results are not applicable to high-severity fires, such as those expected under future climate change. Aims Our aims were to examine (1) persistence of frog species, measured by species richness, up to 18 months post-fire, and (2) the effects of varying fire severity on frog species richness and recovery, where we expected higher fire severity to lead to lower species richness after fire. Methods Using large-scale citizen science data from the Australian Museum’s FrogID project, coupled with remotely sensed fire data, we present a spatially and taxonomically broad analysis examining post-fire recovery responses for Australian frog species after the 2019/2020 ‘Black Summer’ bushfires. Key results We reveal no overall decrease in the species richness of Australian frogs both in the short- and long-term post-fire. Furthermore, species richness did not decline with increasing fire severity. Instead, species richness and its response to fire was highly site-specific. Conclusions We provide evidence that widespread and common Australian frog species have persisted post-fire in most sites and concluded that this is potentially due to their ability to shelter from fire adequately and/or La Niña-driven high rainfall offering conditions conducive to breeding activity and persistence. Implications We show how citizen science provides critical data for conservation, especially in response to unprecedented disturbance events, such as the 2019/2020 megafires. Our research also highlights the need for ongoing and targeted scientific monitoring, especially for less common or threatened species.
“…This is likely due to the ability of frogs to seek refuge from the fires (Rowley et al, 2020) and is consistent with our finding of no clear change in frog diversity post-fire in burnt regions compared to before fire or unburnt regions. This does not, however, discount more localized or species-specific impacts of these fires on frogs (e.g., Beranek et al, 2023). Adaptations and behaviors which facilitate fire survival across taxon groupings may reduce immediate mortality and support persistence; potentially alleviating immediate declines in diversity, but this does not necessarily translate to longer term persistence in post-fire landscapes.…”
Section: Adaptations To Fire and The Impacts Of Changing Fire Regimesmentioning
Conditions conducive to fires are becoming increasingly common and widespread under climate change. Recent fire events across the globe have occurred over unprecedented scales, affecting a diverse array of species and habitats. Understanding biodiversity responses to such fires is critical for conservation. Quantifying post‐fire recovery is problematic across taxa, from insects to plants to vertebrates, especially at large geographic scales. Novel datasets can address this challenge. We use presence‐only citizen science data from iNaturalist, collected before and after the 2019–2020 megafires in burnt and unburnt regions of eastern Australia, to quantify the effect of post‐fire diversity responses, up to 18 months post‐fire. The geographic, temporal, and taxonomic sampling of this dataset was large, but sampling effort and species discoverability were unevenly spread. We used rarefaction and prediction (iNEXT) with which we controlled sampling completeness among treatments, to estimate diversity indices (Hill numbers: q = 0–2) among nine broad taxon groupings and seven habitats, including 3885 species. We estimated an increase in species diversity up to 18 months after the 2019–2020 Australian megafires in regions which were burnt, compared to before the fires in burnt and unburnt regions. Diversity estimates in dry sclerophyll forest matched and likely drove this overall increase post‐fire, while no taxon groupings showed clear increases inconsistent with both control treatments post‐fire. Compared to unburnt regions, overall diversity across all taxon groupings and habitats greatly decreased in areas exposed to extreme fire severity. Post‐fire life histories are complex and species detectability is an important consideration in all post‐fire sampling. We demonstrate how fire characteristics, distinct taxa, and habitat influence biodiversity, as seen in local‐scale datasets. Further integration of large‐scale datasets with small‐scale studies will lead to a more robust understanding of fire recovery.
“…Trees provide microhabitats that can buffer amphibians from extreme weather events (Scheffers et al, 2013(Scheffers et al, , 2014. For example, tree hollow use is speculated to explain the absence of fire impacts for arboreal amphibian species during climate change-driven fires (Beranek et al, 2023). It is possible that trees provide a refuge for L. aurea from floods.…”
Section: Protection From Extreme Weather Eventsmentioning
It is vital to identify habitats used by each life stage of a species to formulate effective conservation management and restoration guidelines. For the threatened green and golden bell frog, Litoria aurea, it is currently recommended that, to prevent waterbody shading, managed or constructed habitat for the species should not include trees. Shading has been reported to prevent adults from sun basking, reduce breeding activity, and lower water temperatures, which may impede tadpole growth and development and provide optimum conditions for the amphibian chytrid pathogen, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. However, the complete exclusion of trees, which are naturally present in L. aurea habitat, warrants evidence that supports this recommendation. In the present study, we used a multi‐year dataset on an L. aurea population on Kooragang Island, NSW, Australia to determine the occurrence of tree use by post‐metamorphic individuals. These data included information on nearly 12 500 individuals captured from 86 waterbodies across 8 consecutive breeding seasons. We found that tree use by juveniles, adult males, and adult females was widespread and common, occurring both during the day and night, with more than one out of every 20 individuals captured in trees. Our findings suggest that trees are a potentially important attribute of the terrestrial component of wetland habitats occupied by L. aurea. We hypothesize that trees may (i) create microhabitat for foraging and/or increased diversity of prey species, (ii) provide refuge from predators, and (iii) allow sun basking off the ground, thereby offering protection against the chytrid fungus while removing them from chytrid‐prevalent environments such as water and moist soils. We call for the careful reconsideration of tree exclusion within L. aurea habitat and further research into the benefits of allowing trees to grow near waterbodies to accommodate the ecological needs of this threatened species.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.