1939
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.4112.852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severe Uterine Inertia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1944
1944
1958
1958

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of papers have been written in recent years describing its use in this country (O'Sullivan, 1939;Fitzgerald, 1949;Corbett, 1952;Cope, 1955) and in the U.S.A. (Douglas and Graves, 1948;Evans and Stander, 1954;Rubovits and Cooperman, 1955) but it is evident that opinions differ as to when it should be employed. Jeffcoate (1955) considers that it should probably be restricted to cases of cervical dystocia, and Cosgrove (1948) has condemned it except on the very rarest occasions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of papers have been written in recent years describing its use in this country (O'Sullivan, 1939;Fitzgerald, 1949;Corbett, 1952;Cope, 1955) and in the U.S.A. (Douglas and Graves, 1948;Evans and Stander, 1954;Rubovits and Cooperman, 1955) but it is evident that opinions differ as to when it should be employed. Jeffcoate (1955) considers that it should probably be restricted to cases of cervical dystocia, and Cosgrove (1948) has condemned it except on the very rarest occasions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%