2020
DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2019.00990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severe or Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss Caused by Novel <i>USH2A</i> Variants in Korea: Potential Genotype-Phenotype Correlation

Abstract: Objectives. We, herein, report two novel <i>USH2A</i> variants from two unrelated Korean families and their clinical phenotypes, with attention to severe or more than severe sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).Methods. Two postlingually deafened subjects (SB237-461, M/46 and SB354-692, F/34) with more than severe SNHL and also with suspicion of Usher syndrome type II (USH2) were enrolled. A comprehensive audiological and ophthalmological assessments were evaluated. We conducted the whole exome sequen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, USH2A is a frequent causal gene in Japanese RP patients as well as Caucasian RP patients, yet the mutation spectrum is different among different ethnic groups [ 19 , 20 ]. Genotype–phenotype correlation in USH2A has been reported where truncating variants are associated with more severe visual and hearing impairments [ 9 , 21 , 22 ], and similar trends have also been reported in Asians [ 23 , 24 ]. In contrast, there are studies reporting that the differences in phenotypes are not clear in syndromic and non-syndromic or truncating variants and non-truncating variants [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In previous studies, USH2A is a frequent causal gene in Japanese RP patients as well as Caucasian RP patients, yet the mutation spectrum is different among different ethnic groups [ 19 , 20 ]. Genotype–phenotype correlation in USH2A has been reported where truncating variants are associated with more severe visual and hearing impairments [ 9 , 21 , 22 ], and similar trends have also been reported in Asians [ 23 , 24 ]. In contrast, there are studies reporting that the differences in phenotypes are not clear in syndromic and non-syndromic or truncating variants and non-truncating variants [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The OTOF variants (Glu841Lys, Arg1856Trp, Leu1011Pro, Tyr1064Ter, and Arg1939Gln) were highly prevalent among Korean subjects with prelingual ANSD [ 6 , 20 , 24 ]. Subsequently, exome sequencing was performed to verify that the subjects did not carry convincing variants in the deafness panel, followed by bioinformatics analyses, as described previously [ 25 , 26 ]. The resulting readings were compared to the UCSC hg19 reference genome, and non-synonymous SNPs were filtered with a depth = 40; dbSNP138 was filtered out, except for the flagged SNP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting readings were compared to the UCSC hg19 reference genome, and non-synonymous SNPs were filtered with a depth = 40; dbSNP138 was filtered out, except for the flagged SNP. Using a comprehensive filtering process, rare single-nucleotide variations, indels, or splice-site variants were chosen, as described in our previous studies [ 25 , 26 ]. Subsequently, Sanger sequencing and segregation analyses were used to confirm the variant of the candidate deafness genes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw data generated by ES were mapped onto the UCSC hg19 reference genome, and rare single‐nucleotide variations, indels, or splice‐site variants were selected. Filtration was used to identify the candidate variants, as previously described (Lee et al, 2020). The analytical approach applied in the study, as well as the number of candidate variants filtered at each step, is described in Figure S1.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%