2014
DOI: 10.1080/01652176.2014.905881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severe laminitis in multiple zoo species

Abstract: A 10-year record review from a zoological institution in the western USA identified four cases of severe laminitis resulting in rotation and protrusion of the third phalanx through the sole. Laminitis is reported in a Masai giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi), a Sichuan takin (Budorcas taxicolor tibetana), a greater Malayan chevrotain (Tragulus napu) and a giant eland (Taurotragus derbianus). This is the first report of severe laminitis with pedal bone rotation and protrusion in multiple species of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NPAS in horses can be graded to help define how the hoof is trimmed and possibly the shape of shoe needed to restore more normal weight bearing and thus address lameness [ 48 ]. While at least one zoo giraffe has been described with an excessive positive palmar angle with parturition-associated laminitis [ 9 ], some zoo giraffe lameness cases appear to be associated with a negative palmar angle [ 21 ] that could resemble NPAS in horses. Further study is warranted to determine if hoof trimming that maintains a slightly positive palmar/plantar angle as observed in free-ranging giraffe could help zoo giraffe and other exotic hoofstock species better maintain foot health and avoid some lameness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NPAS in horses can be graded to help define how the hoof is trimmed and possibly the shape of shoe needed to restore more normal weight bearing and thus address lameness [ 48 ]. While at least one zoo giraffe has been described with an excessive positive palmar angle with parturition-associated laminitis [ 9 ], some zoo giraffe lameness cases appear to be associated with a negative palmar angle [ 21 ] that could resemble NPAS in horses. Further study is warranted to determine if hoof trimming that maintains a slightly positive palmar/plantar angle as observed in free-ranging giraffe could help zoo giraffe and other exotic hoofstock species better maintain foot health and avoid some lameness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoof overgrowth and chronic lameness are well-described health concerns for zoo giraffe [ 1 – 4 ]. Causes of lameness appear to be multifactorial, and include diseases of the hoof [ 5 – 7 ], soft tissues [ 8 , 9 ], joints [ 10 – 14 ], and bones [ 15 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enclosure design, floor substrate, hygiene conditions and nutrition must meet with the natural history and welfare of the species to prevent health problems, including those of the feet. 8,22 Spillover of foot pathogens between closely related species must be minimized by means of practical hygiene measures between enclosures and adequate quarantine investigations for new acquisitions. The inability to perform routine foot evaluations and trims in noncompliant species may further jeopardize foot health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on appropriate ration composition is available, but browsers are generally more challenging to feed and demonstrate a shorter relative lifespan (Müller et al., ) and higher record of nutrition‐related problems (Clauss, Kienzle, & Hatt, ) in captivity compared to grazing ruminants. Different nutrition‐related syndromes have been discussed for giraffe: (i) some captive individuals tend to show poor body condition or ultimately serous fat atrophy, caused by insufficient feed and energy intake (Clauss, Rose, Hummel, & Hatt, ; Potter & Clauss, ); in contrast to many other species, reports on obese individuals are missing in giraffe; (ii) occasionally captive giraffes suffer from typical feeding‐related disorders in ruminants like acidosis and laminitis related to high‐concentrate rations (Clauss, Lechner‐Doll, Flach, Wisser, & Hatt, ; Wiedner, Holland, & Trupkiewicz, ); (iii) heavier tooth wear was observed in captive compared to free‐ranging giraffe (Clauss, Franz‐Odendaal, Brasch, Castell, & Kaiser, ), potentially due to higher abrasiveness of zoo rations (Kaiser, Brasch, Castell, Schulz, & Clauss, ); (iv) captive giraffes excrete larger faecal particles compared to free‐ranging giraffes indicating a less effective particle size reduction capacity for zoo rations (Hummel et al., ); and (v) the frequency of feeding and ration composition influenced feed intake activity and the occurrence of oral stereotypies in captive giraffes (Bashaw, Tarou, Maki, & Maple, ; Hummel, Clauss, Baxter, Flach, & Johansen, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; in contrast to many other species, reports on obese individuals are missing in giraffe; (ii) occasionally captive giraffes suffer from typical feeding-related disorders in ruminants like acidosis and laminitis related to high-concentrate rations (Clauss, Lechner-Doll, Flach, Wisser, & Hatt, 2002;Wiedner, Holland, & Trupkiewicz, 2014); (iii) heavier tooth wear was observed in captive compared to free-ranging giraffe (Clauss, Franz-Odendaal, Brasch, Castell, & Kaiser, 2007), potentially due to higher abrasiveness of zoo rations (Kaiser, Brasch, Castell, Schulz, & Clauss, 2009); (iv) captive giraffes excrete larger faecal particles compared to free-ranging giraffes indicating a less effective particle size reduction capacity for zoo rations (Hummel et al, 2008); and (v) the frequency of feeding and ration composition influenced feed intake activity and the occurrence of oral stereotypies in captive giraffes (Bashaw, Tarou, Maki, & Maple, 2001;Hummel, Clauss, Baxter, Flach, & Johansen, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%