1957
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1957.02980350036008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severe Immediate Reactions to Biologicals Caused by Silk Allergy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some early reports on human allergic sensitivity to silk (Clarke and Meyer 1923; Figley and Parkhurst 1933), sericin was indeed suggested as a cause, but only because its solubility in water. Most of the studies published at the same time or later (Taub 1930; Friedman et al 1957; Brown and Coleman 1957; Kino and Oshima 1979; Häcki et al 1982; Johansson et al 1985; Harindranath et al 1985; Nakazawa and Umegae 1990; Suzuki et al 1995; Celedón et al 2001) could not confirm this suggestion. Other investigators also have initially proposed sericin as a pathogen (Zhaoming et al 1990) only to play down later this assertion (Zhaoming et al 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In some early reports on human allergic sensitivity to silk (Clarke and Meyer 1923; Figley and Parkhurst 1933), sericin was indeed suggested as a cause, but only because its solubility in water. Most of the studies published at the same time or later (Taub 1930; Friedman et al 1957; Brown and Coleman 1957; Kino and Oshima 1979; Häcki et al 1982; Johansson et al 1985; Harindranath et al 1985; Nakazawa and Umegae 1990; Suzuki et al 1995; Celedón et al 2001) could not confirm this suggestion. Other investigators also have initially proposed sericin as a pathogen (Zhaoming et al 1990) only to play down later this assertion (Zhaoming et al 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%