2010
DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0b013e3181b66dbd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severe Dysphagia in Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Esophageal Stricture: An Indication for Balloon Dilation?

Abstract: In our pediatric series, combined medical (corticosteroids, elemental diet, and food elimination diet) and endoscopic approach (repeated balloon dilation) were effective and safe in patients with severe EoE and esophageal stricture.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
28
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Subgroup analyses revealed possible trends toward different adverse event rates by publication period, maximum dilator size, and pediatric versus adult studies, although none of these differences reached statistical significance (Supplemental Tables 5–7). For instance, the point estimates of frequency of perforation (0.0%; 95% CI, 0%–1.88%), clinically significant chest pain (2.19%; 95% CI, 0%–5.65%), and any chest discomfort (10.2%; 95% CI, 0%–23.2%) were lower for pediatric than for adult studies, although only 2 to 3 studies contributed to each of these pediatric estimates 28, 29, 36 Perforation rate with larger dilators (>17 mm) was 1.35% (95% CI, 0%–8.43%) versus 0.03% (95% CI, 0%–0.226%) for smaller dilators, hospitalization 4.02% (95% CI, 0%–16.6%) versus 0.511% (95% CI, 0%–1.08%), and clinically significant chest pain 7.14% (95% CI, 0%–19.8%) versus 4.46% (95% CI, 1.41%–7.50%). Finally, the meta-analysis confirmed the direction of association between studies published before 2009 with higher perforation rates, estimating a 0.41% (95% CI, 0%–2.75%) rate before 2009 compared with 0.030% (95% CI, 0%–0.225%) in more recent studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Subgroup analyses revealed possible trends toward different adverse event rates by publication period, maximum dilator size, and pediatric versus adult studies, although none of these differences reached statistical significance (Supplemental Tables 5–7). For instance, the point estimates of frequency of perforation (0.0%; 95% CI, 0%–1.88%), clinically significant chest pain (2.19%; 95% CI, 0%–5.65%), and any chest discomfort (10.2%; 95% CI, 0%–23.2%) were lower for pediatric than for adult studies, although only 2 to 3 studies contributed to each of these pediatric estimates 28, 29, 36 Perforation rate with larger dilators (>17 mm) was 1.35% (95% CI, 0%–8.43%) versus 0.03% (95% CI, 0%–0.226%) for smaller dilators, hospitalization 4.02% (95% CI, 0%–16.6%) versus 0.511% (95% CI, 0%–1.08%), and clinically significant chest pain 7.14% (95% CI, 0%–19.8%) versus 4.46% (95% CI, 1.41%–7.50%). Finally, the meta-analysis confirmed the direction of association between studies published before 2009 with higher perforation rates, estimating a 0.41% (95% CI, 0%–2.75%) rate before 2009 compared with 0.030% (95% CI, 0%–0.225%) in more recent studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies contributed the majority of dilation procedures (1232 dilations on 532 patients), 12, 13, 27 whereas 18 studies described single-digit numbers of dilated patients, totaling 86 dilation procedures (Table 1). Of the studies with more than one subject, three focused on pediatric patients, 28, 29, 36 2 3 were restricted to adults, 2 had both adults and children, 12, 13 and in one, abstract age was not reported. 37 The follow-up periods of the individual studies ranged from 1 week to 14 years (median 14.7 months).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations