2005
DOI: 10.1159/000087766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Severe Dilatation of Saphenous Vein Grafts: A Late Complication of Coronary Surgery in Which the Diagnosis Is Suggested by Chest X-Ray

Abstract: Aneurysmal dilatation of saphenous vein graft (SVG), first reported in 1975, is secondary to true aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm. We report 1 case and review 107 cases published since 1975. Severe SVG dilatations are large (6 ± 3 cm), occur remote from surgery (12 ± 4 years) and are life threatening, with 15.7% in-hospital mortality. Symptoms are nonspecific and the abnormality is initially observed by chest X-ray in 57% of cases. The chest X-ray abnormalities have a distinctive appearance that may suggest both di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…64 Similarly, echocardiography has limitations in that not all SVGAs can be properly imaged, depending on their location, with several reports describing their misdiagnoses as intracardiac masses with the technique. [65][66][67] Therefore, given the potential limitations of coronary angiography and echocardiography, a crosssectional modality such as CT or magnetic resonance imaging should be used in the initial assessment to definitively establish the presence of an SVGA and to assess for mechanical complications. Furthermore, with the increasing proficiency of coronary CT angiography, information on native and graft vessel anatomy may be derived in some instances without catheterization (Figure 2A and 2B).…”
Section: Diagnostic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64 Similarly, echocardiography has limitations in that not all SVGAs can be properly imaged, depending on their location, with several reports describing their misdiagnoses as intracardiac masses with the technique. [65][66][67] Therefore, given the potential limitations of coronary angiography and echocardiography, a crosssectional modality such as CT or magnetic resonance imaging should be used in the initial assessment to definitively establish the presence of an SVGA and to assess for mechanical complications. Furthermore, with the increasing proficiency of coronary CT angiography, information on native and graft vessel anatomy may be derived in some instances without catheterization (Figure 2A and 2B).…”
Section: Diagnostic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to such pathophysiology, pseudoaneuryms are commonly seen as an acute finding whereas true aneuryms caused by atherosclerosis, are more subclinical and chronic in nature. It is also important to note that true aneurysms are more common than pseudoaneurysms by a ratio of 6:1 [13]. Because the differentiation between a pseudoaneurysm and true aneurysm is pathologically determined and not always delineated, the term "aneurysm" will be used in the remainder of this report.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They further suggested that SVGAs radiographically visualized in the right sternal border mainly represent SVGAs bypassing the right coronary artery and that SVGAs seen in the left upper sternal border seem to typically bypass the left anterior descending artery. Ones seen in the left lower sternal border were found to be bypassing the LAD and left circumflex artery or both [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although SVG aneurysms are often incidentally identified on any type of imaging modality, there are some reports about cases of rupture 4, fistula formation with neighboring anatomy 5, and hemodynamic compromise resulting from compression of adjacent cardiac and vascular structures 6. Moreover, in‐hospital mortality associated with giant SVG aneurysms was reported to be 15.7% 7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%