The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01146.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Several components of global change alter nitrifying and denitrifying activities in an annual grassland

Abstract: Summary1. The effects of global change on below-ground processes of the nitrogen (N) cycle have repercussions for plant communities, productivity and trace gas effluxes. However, the interacting effects of different components of global change on nitrification or denitrification have rarely been studied in situ. 2. We measured responses of nitrifying enzyme activity (NEA) and denitrifying enzyme activity (DEA) to over 4 years of exposure to several components of global change and their interaction (increased a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
67
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
10
67
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the clearest effects observed in our experiment was a shift in bacterial communities in response to simulated climate warming. Although published evidence on microbial responses to experimental warming under field conditions is scarce (4,30), observational data suggest that microbial communities can be greatly influenced by temperature regimes. For example, decreasing bacterial diversity was found along a temperature gradient in an artificially aerated lagoon (50), and soil bacterial communities differed along a thermal gradient (35 to 65°C) resulting from recent geothermal activity in Yellowstone National Park, with apparently less complex communities in heated than in geothermally unaffected soils (44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the clearest effects observed in our experiment was a shift in bacterial communities in response to simulated climate warming. Although published evidence on microbial responses to experimental warming under field conditions is scarce (4,30), observational data suggest that microbial communities can be greatly influenced by temperature regimes. For example, decreasing bacterial diversity was found along a temperature gradient in an artificially aerated lagoon (50), and soil bacterial communities differed along a thermal gradient (35 to 65°C) resulting from recent geothermal activity in Yellowstone National Park, with apparently less complex communities in heated than in geothermally unaffected soils (44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Warming generally increased net or gross N mineralization and immobilization rates (Rustad et al 2001, Shaw andHarte 2001), while the response of nitrification to increased temperature was highly variable, and the response of denitrification was generally non-significant (Barnard et al 2005). Changes in precipitation regimes, through changes in soil moisture, significantly altered rates of N cycling processes in field studies (Barnard et al 2006, Dijkstra et al 2010, Larsen et al 2010: in particular, increased soil moisture can result in enhanced N mineralization, N immobilization, and nitrification rates under water-limiting conditions (Jamieson et al 1999, Avrahami and Bohannan 2007, Dijkstra et al 2010, or in increased denitrification rates by enhancing anaerobic conditions (Barnard et al 2006). Finally, enhanced N deposition increased gross and potential N mineralization rates through increases in primary productivity and decreases in C/N ratio of the organic matter (Booth et al 2005, Vourtilis et al 2007) and enhanced gross and potential nitrification and denitrification rates through increases in soil inorganic N availability (Barnard et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of longer and more severe drought on soil biota are still poorly investigated. From an ecological point of view, a decrease in precipitation may reduce soil wetness (Limousin et al 2009), decrease soil carbon exchange (Misson et al 2010) and affect major soil enzymatic activities with consequences for phosphorus, carbon and nitrogen turnover (Barnard et al 2006;Sardans and Penuelas 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%