2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seventeen years’ growth of street trees in structural soil compared with a tree lawn in New York City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several studies that estimate surface permeability of materials used in urban environment, but most of them are related to stormwater mitigation problem. The following are specifically devoted to tree condition: Volder et al (2009), Morgenroth and Buchan (2009), Johnson et al (2011), Morgenroth et al (2013), Volder et al (2014), Song et al (2015), Mullaney et al (2015c), Grabosky and Bassuk (2016), and Kramer et al (2015). However, since it remains difficult to assess their long-term effects, modeling is a promising direction especially to explore benefits of proposed solutions under different hydroclimatic conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies that estimate surface permeability of materials used in urban environment, but most of them are related to stormwater mitigation problem. The following are specifically devoted to tree condition: Volder et al (2009), Morgenroth and Buchan (2009), Johnson et al (2011), Morgenroth et al (2013), Volder et al (2014), Song et al (2015), Mullaney et al (2015c), Grabosky and Bassuk (2016), and Kramer et al (2015). However, since it remains difficult to assess their long-term effects, modeling is a promising direction especially to explore benefits of proposed solutions under different hydroclimatic conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppressed, slender trees are less stable than dominant trees [39]. Additionally, studies of freely growing trees have found smaller trees to be more slender than larger trees [31,32], indicating that slenderness is also related to tree development and not exclusively to its social status within a stand or stand density. For this reason, we also tested the slenderness coefficient with a higher weight on tree height.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each tree, we calculated the slenderness coefficient (height to DBH (HD −1 ) ratio), as it is commonly used to determine tree resistance to loading. However, smaller trees are found to have higher slenderness than taller, older trees when the competition is not a limiting factor [31,32], thus we also tested the effect of quadratic-height to DBH (H 2 D −1 ) ratio as a measure of tree slenderness that considers tree height. Relative snapping height was calculated as a ratio between snapping height and tree height and converted to a percentage.…”
Section: Modeling Of Snapping Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we tested the commonly used height to DBH ratio (HD -1 ). Considering that under conditions where competition is not a limiting factor trees at a young age naturally tend to have higher slenderness than trees at later development stages (Rust 2014;Grabosky and Bassuk 2016) we also tested the effect of a quadratic-height to DBH ratio (H 2 D -1 ) to put a larger emphasis on tree height. The results revealed only HD -1 to be significant (Table 1), therefore the model using H 2 D -1 was rejected from the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%