2011
DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: SKY MAPS, SYSTEMATIC ERRORS, AND BASIC RESULTS

Abstract: New full sky temperature and polarization maps based on seven years of data from WMAP are presented. The new results are consistent with previous results, but have improved due to reduced noise from the additional integration time, improved knowledge of the instrument performance, and improved data analysis procedures. The improvements are described in detail.The seven year data set is well fit by a minimal six-parameter flat ΛCDM model. The parameters for this model, using the WMAP data in conjunction with ba… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

67
792
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,072 publications
(863 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
67
792
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the matter-to-radiation ratio and the baryon-to-photon ratio are well measured by the relative heights of the acoustic peaks in the CMB anisotropy power spectrum. Analyses of WMAP data in the usual ΛCDM cosmological models gives a 1.1% inference of the acoustic scale r s (Jarosik et al, 2011); Planck is expected to shrink this error bar to 0.25%. Note that the acoustic scale is determined in absolute units, Mpc not h −1 Mpc.…”
Section: General Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the matter-to-radiation ratio and the baryon-to-photon ratio are well measured by the relative heights of the acoustic peaks in the CMB anisotropy power spectrum. Analyses of WMAP data in the usual ΛCDM cosmological models gives a 1.1% inference of the acoustic scale r s (Jarosik et al, 2011); Planck is expected to shrink this error bar to 0.25%. Note that the acoustic scale is determined in absolute units, Mpc not h −1 Mpc.…”
Section: General Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering, for instance, λ = L/3 ∼ 33 Mpc, we can compute the cross section σ as a function of the DM particle's mass m DM . We consider for the mean DM density in the universe, ρ DM = 1.2 × 10 −6 GeV/cm 3 [13]. In figure 2 we show the space of parameters that results in a 95% neutrino flux suppression or more.…”
Section: Neutrino Flux and Dark Matter Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cosmological observations of clusters of galaxies indicate that the density fraction of DM is Ω DM ≈ 0.227 ± 0.014 [13]. The two most popular solution to the DM problem are i) a slight modification on the Newtonian dynamics [14] and ii) relic particles [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accelerated expansion of our Universe is confirmed by many separated cosmological experiments [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. This expansion can be explained in GR by taking into account the dark energy component in the total energy of our Universe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%