2004
DOI: 10.1080/10702890490883858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Settlers” and Zimbabwe: Politics, Memory, and the Anthropology of Commercial Farms During a Time of Crisis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These positive political signs were in sharp contrast to the tumultuous political conditions in the migrants' home nation of Zimbabwe (Rutherford, 2004).…”
Section: Banking Reform Enablesmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These positive political signs were in sharp contrast to the tumultuous political conditions in the migrants' home nation of Zimbabwe (Rutherford, 2004).…”
Section: Banking Reform Enablesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The elections in 2003 ushered the President Obasanjo administration in the second term and were largely hailed by international agencies as being relatively transparent (Lubeck et al, 2007). These positive political signs were in sharp contrast to the tumultuous political conditions in Zimbabwe, the home nation of migrants (Rutherford, 2004). Thus, the Shonga Farms project coincided with the second administration of Obasanjo (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007) who embarked on an economic reform programme.…”
Section: Evolution In the Environment Affects The Ownership Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As I have discussed elsewhere (Rutherford ), these NGO programmes were interlaced with not only the hierarchical power relations of domestic government and shaped by the arbitrary and often harsh working conditions, but were also influenced by various social dynamics concerning gender, generation, youth, race and appraisals of moral worthiness. Moreover, their consequences varied widely, depending on a host of factors, including the particular social projects towards which different participants (farmworkers and farmers) put them.…”
Section: Agrarian Labour In Zimbabwementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, their consequences varied widely, depending on a host of factors, including the particular social projects towards which different participants (farmworkers and farmers) put them. The growth of NGO projects was definitely part and parcel of neo‐liberal governmentality practices found throughout Africa and elsewhere in the 1990s, but their consequences varied as these NGO activities ‘articulated with other practices and demands involving some farmworkers and farmers – neither in a transformative way nor in a singularly hegemonic manner’ (Rutherford , 145).…”
Section: Agrarian Labour In Zimbabwementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of fundamental importance in this regard is the extent to which white farmers express racist, essentialist viewpoints about Africans. As Rutherford (2004) found during his research in Zimbabwe, it was common for white farmers to claim to understand the essence of their African ‘other’. A lengthy but fairly typical example is provided in the following quote about African farming practices:…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%