2015
DOI: 10.26530/oapen_569095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Settler Colonial Governance in Nineteenth-Century Victoria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the development of Victoria in establishing itself as its own colony, there was a shift towards an electoral system of appointment for public office, where these systems had built in them several criteria. The primary criterion was that only those considered 'gentlemen' could stand for election into public office [10]. This raises questions of what constitutes a 'gentleman' as it is inherently subjective and open to the possibility of nepotism, where people in power would recommend connections and family members as 'gentlemen' , it is therefore of little surprise that despite what appears to be the best of intentions, there was soon a system of administration established that was ripe for criticism based on loose practice at best and criminality at worst.…”
Section: Development: the 1800smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the development of Victoria in establishing itself as its own colony, there was a shift towards an electoral system of appointment for public office, where these systems had built in them several criteria. The primary criterion was that only those considered 'gentlemen' could stand for election into public office [10]. This raises questions of what constitutes a 'gentleman' as it is inherently subjective and open to the possibility of nepotism, where people in power would recommend connections and family members as 'gentlemen' , it is therefore of little surprise that despite what appears to be the best of intentions, there was soon a system of administration established that was ripe for criticism based on loose practice at best and criminality at worst.…”
Section: Development: the 1800smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complementary account can be given of the temporal dimensions of racialised embodiment, with work from Fanon (1952, 1967), Al‐Saji (2013), and Ngo (2019) exploring the ways they are differently figured for racialised (and especially colonised) bodies. As Fanon and Al‐Saji have argued, the colonised body is anachronistic, temporalised as past, primitive, and future‐less: think, for example, of the frequent assumption (or assertion 14 ) in colonial Australia and elsewhere, that First Nations peoples would eventually and inevitably ‘die‐out’ (Boucher & Russell, 2015, p. 17). Albeit in different ways to the spatial register, temporal horizons are also closed in; a past not of one's own making looms heavy and large, once more depriving racialised bodies of a vital sense of ‘leeway’ (Al‐Saji, 2019, pp.…”
Section: Toward Thinking the Banality Of White Supremacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ruses could take a variety of forms – the most obvious being the notion of the “dying race” that so powerfully fantasised about the inevitable disappearance of the Aboriginal problem whilst also justifying specific practices of governance that would enact it’. (2015, p. 17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The colony of Victoria was the earliest to institute bureaucratic control over Indigenous people in Australia in response to the catastrophic destruction of the Tasmanians and the severity of frontier violence and disease (Boucher & Russell, 2015;Broome, 2005). Working with Dr. Len Smith, who had pioneered the historical demography of Aboriginal Victorians (Smith, 1980), we sought to reconstitute the population from oral genealogy and vital registrations, as the public records rarely noted indigeneity.…”
Section: Melbourne Lying-in Hospital Birth Cohort 1857-1900 (Lih Birth Cohort 1857-1900)mentioning
confidence: 99%