Settlement Burials at the Karsdorf LBK Site, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Abstract

The Linearbandkeramik (LBK) settlement of Karsdorf (Saxony-Anhalt, Germany) revealed twenty-four longhouses and thirty-four associated burials. They were investigated in an interdisciplinary study focusing primarily on biological relationships and mobility within the community. Males, females, and subadults were buried individually or in groups in pits accompanying longhouses suggesting family relationships. The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), however, revealed only few biological relations among them. The rare potential relatives were found in different houses, indicating very low continuity of maternal lineages. Strontium isotope ratios of human tooth enamel point to differentiated land-use patterns or interaction of the Karsdorf community in the Unstrut river valley with people from settlements in typical loess locations. Representatives of both isotope ranges distinguished occur among all burial groups. The integrated interpretation of all data suggests exchange of people within consolidated networks of LBK neighbouring communities.

A Community in Life and Death: The Late Neolithic Megalithic Tomb at Alto de Reinoso (Burgos, Spain)

“…The results point to different population-dynamic processes in these regions in the latter stages of the Neolithic period. This stands in contrast to genetic data obtained in Central Europe, where populations seem to have remained rather uniform in their mitochondrial composition during the Early and Middle Neolithic [ 16 , 21 , 86 ].…”

Human paleogenetics of Europe – The known knowns and the known unknowns

“…(B) The majority of these ancient DNA sequences were pooled into 22 groups according to cultural affiliation or spatial and temporal relations. The mtDNA haplogroup frequencies of these groups were used to perform PCA as described in Brandt et al (2014). Each haplogroup is superimposed as component loading vector (grey), proportionally to its contribution.…”

Re-integrating Archaeology: A Contribution to aDNA Studies and the Migration Discourse on the 3rd Millennium BC in Europe

“…What is more, even when one uses a polythetic classification to account for the multi-dimensionality of social identities, or social group affiliations, the anthropological record suggests that people have the possibility to change their group affiliations, create new or join already existing social groups (eg, Cameron 2013). Such a fluidity of social groups can show a wide range from more to less open and intermixed settings (eg, Hillier & Hansen 1984;Schachner 2012) but it is a widespread phenomenon in state-less societies, and archaeological and scientific data have pointed to several Neolithic local communities being composed of individuals with diverse social backgrounds (that is, areas of origin, mobility patterns, diets, see Bentley 2007;Zvelebil & Pettitt 2013;Brandt et al 2014;Hachem & Hamon 2014). This is a cautionary tale for the association of archaeological unitsbe they polythetically of monothetically classifiedwith specific, clearly circumscribed groups of people.…”