1991
DOI: 10.3208/sandf1972.31.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Settlement Behaviour of Non-Linear Soil around Single Piles Subjected to Vertical Loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where f and g represent constant coefficients. Kuwabara [14] proposed a relationship for the analysis of axial-loaded piles in which a linear characteristic for the change of the G modulus was assumed as a function of log(g) in the range of 10 -2 % < g < 1%. On the other hand, Van Impe and De Clercq [15] applied the G modulus degradation function in a slightly modified form:…”
Section: Degradation Functions Of G Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where f and g represent constant coefficients. Kuwabara [14] proposed a relationship for the analysis of axial-loaded piles in which a linear characteristic for the change of the G modulus was assumed as a function of log(g) in the range of 10 -2 % < g < 1%. On the other hand, Van Impe and De Clercq [15] applied the G modulus degradation function in a slightly modified form:…”
Section: Degradation Functions Of G Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Figure 4 shows that for the piles TS1 and TS2 loaded to failure, the skin friction along pile depth approaches the limiting state, and decreases from a peak value with increasing load. In practice, a simple hyperbolic model is commonly used to simulate the relationship between unit skin friction and pile-soil relative displacement (Kuwabara 1991;Carrubba 1997;Kim et al 1999;Lee and Xiao 2001;Randolph 2003;Zhang et al 2010). In the hyperbolic model, a very large pile-soil relative displacement is required to fully mobilize the skin friction.…”
Section: Relative Displacement Between Pile and Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, efforts to simplify equation 8so that equation 11could be solved analytically were not successful (Michaelides & Gazetas, 1995). By contrast, solutions have been presented for the static problem (Kraft et al, 1981;Kuwabara, 1991). To overcome this dif®culty, the soil was divided into four inhomogeneous{ ring zones and the`exact' radial variation of shear modulus (as given in equation (8)) was numerically curve-®tted with the following exponential expressions: Ã As this article was being ®nalized, a paper was published by Viggiani & Atkinson (1995) containing a wealth of experimental data, relating shear modulus at small strain levels to the mean effective stress, in the form G s A(ó 9 v ) n .…”
Section: Dynamic Soil Reaction (`Spring' and Dashpot' For A Pile Slice)mentioning
confidence: 99%