2019
DOI: 10.1111/puar.13082
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting the Regulatory Agenda: Statutory Deadlines, Delay, and Responsiveness

Abstract: Congress imposes statutory deadlines in an attempt to influence agency regulatory agendas, but agencies regularly fail to meet them. What explains agency responsiveness to statutory deadlines? Taking a transaction cost politics approach, the authors develop a theory of responsiveness to deadlines centered on political feasibility to explain how agency managers map rulemaking onto calendar and political time. This theory is tested on all unique rules with statutory deadlines published in the Unified Agenda of F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Take, for instance, the results attached to Unified Government. While this construct is not a focus of our theorising, it is a critical predictor variable in numerous studies focused on the delegation-discretion relationship (Epstein and O'Halloran 1999;Tsebelis 2002;Farhang and Yaver 2016;Revesz and Davis Noll 2019;Bertelli and Doherty 2019). Interestingly, we find no evidence of Unified Government affecting draft rule timing.…”
Section: Other Findingsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Take, for instance, the results attached to Unified Government. While this construct is not a focus of our theorising, it is a critical predictor variable in numerous studies focused on the delegation-discretion relationship (Epstein and O'Halloran 1999;Tsebelis 2002;Farhang and Yaver 2016;Revesz and Davis Noll 2019;Bertelli and Doherty 2019). Interestingly, we find no evidence of Unified Government affecting draft rule timing.…”
Section: Other Findingsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…As a result, while the exact normative threshold for what constitutes "responsiveness" may be difficult to pin down, it is clear that, at a minimum, the idea of responsiveness has elements of timing built in. Bertelli and Doherty (2019) offer an important innovation by focusing on calendar and political time. In their analysis of congressionally imposed deadlines, they find that while federal government agencies frequently miss rule-specific date deadlines in congressional statutes, agencies often promulgate these same rules before the next major political election.…”
Section: The Timing Of Agency Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a strategic perspective for a given Senator or caucus, more vacancies may also slow White House regulatory review (Mendelson 2014) or increase an agency's propensity to miss statutory deadlines (Bertelli and Doherty 2019).…”
Section: Vacancies As a Function Of Institutional Bargaining And Dele...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agency success in these coalition‐building endeavors displaces the kind of ex ante controls that lie at the heart of political control theories, for instance, statutory procedural requirements (cf. Bertelli and Doherty 2019; Bertelli, Travaglini, and McCann 2019). Essentially, both ex ante and ex post political control compete with RSA, and they may meet resistance from the very audiences that are the sources of RSA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%