2014
DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.398v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting the record straight on invasive lionfish control: Culling works

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The success of this invasive marine teleost has prompted many studies on its behaviour and effects of the invasion (Kimball et al 2004;Schofield 2010;Albins and Hixon 2011;Biggs and Olden 2011;Côté et al 2014;Anton et al 2016). These studies have highlighted the generalist nature of lionfish predatory feeding, indiscriminate habitat selection and diversion from their crepuscular feeding strategies (Cöté and Maljković 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of this invasive marine teleost has prompted many studies on its behaviour and effects of the invasion (Kimball et al 2004;Schofield 2010;Albins and Hixon 2011;Biggs and Olden 2011;Côté et al 2014;Anton et al 2016). These studies have highlighted the generalist nature of lionfish predatory feeding, indiscriminate habitat selection and diversion from their crepuscular feeding strategies (Cöté and Maljković 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the feasibility of such initiatives requires modeling the change in biomass in response to changes in fishing mortality (i.e., culling). A common way to model this is via length-structured population models, where fish lengths are converted to weight to calculate total biomass (Barbour et al, 2011; Côté et al, 2014; Andradi-Brown et al, 2017). The allometric length-weight relationship is thus an essential component of these models, but this relationship can vary across regions as a response to biotic and abiotic conditions (Johnson & Swenarton, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes of previous studies suggest lionfish are likely to exhibit spatial heterogeneity in the length-weight relationship for both behavioral and biological reasons. Important life history characteristics such as growth or natural mortality rates are often spatially variable for fish that exhibit sedentary behavior (Gunderson et al, 2008; Hutchinson, 2008; Wilson et al, 2012; Guan et al, 2013), and in fact, high levels of site fidelity and small home ranges are two primary reasons why culling programs are effective in reducing local adult lionfish populations (Fishelson, 1997; Kochzius & Blohm, 2005; Jud & Layman, 2012; Côté et al, 2014). Genetic analysis of lionfish also identified two genetically distinct invasive subpopulations between the Western Atlantic and the Caribbean, suggesting the existence of spatially explicit biological differences between populations as well (Betancur-R et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These types of removal efforts have proven effective in reducing lionfish abundance from various locations in the Caribbean [9,20,23,24]. For example, a study that compared fished and unfished areas of Bonaire over a two year period (2009)(2010)(2011) found that lionfish biomass in fished locations on Bonaire was 2.76-fold lower than in unfished areas from the same island [23].…”
Section: Sift Deskmentioning
confidence: 99%