Setting standards and monitoring quality in the NHS 1999-2013: a classic case of goal conflict

Abstract

Abstract2013 saw the National Health Service (NHS) in England severely criticized for providing poor quality despite successive governments in the previous 15 years, establishing a range of new institutions to improve NHS quality. This study seeks to understand the contributions of political and organizational influences in enabling the NHS to deliver high‐quality care through exploring the experiences of two of the major new organizations established to set standards and monitor NHS quality. We used a mixed method approach: first a cross‐sectional, in‐depth qualitative interview study and then the application of principal agent modeling (Waterman and Meier broader framework). Ten themes were identified as influencing the functioning of the NHS regulatory institutions: socio‐political environment; governance and accountability; external relationships; clarity of purpose; organizational reputation; leadership and management; organizational stability; resources; organizational methods; and organizational performance. The organizations could be easily mapped onto the framework, and their transience between the different states could be monitored. We concluded that differing policy objectives for NHS quality monitoring resulted in central involvement and organizational change. This had a disruptive effect on the ability of the NHS to monitor quality. Constant professional leadership, both clinical and managerial, and basing decisions on best evidence, both technical and organizational, helped one institution to deliver on its remit, even within a changing political/policy environment. Application of the Waterman–Meier framework enabled an understanding and description of the dynamic relationship between central government and organizations in the NHS and may predict when tensions will arise in the future. © 2016 The Authors. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Can Medical Students Lead Effective Quality Improvement Initiatives? A Systematic Review

“…36 Instead, the focus of nationalized health care systems would be on improving efficiency, an ideal environment for QUIPs focusing on conformance and performance. 37 The second hypothesis for this pattern of focus on quality could be attributed to the nature of student-led QUIPs, whereby focusing on conformance can be considered more easily quantifiable and easier to demonstrate change utilizing a pro forma or checklist, which were more commonly used as interventions.…”

A telemedicina pode ser tão confiável quanto a medicina convencional quando usada no sistema único de saúde - SUS?

“…Alguns estudos relacionados à regulação dos serviços de saúde foram desenvolvidos internacionalmente, entre eles está o de Littlejohns et al 19 , em pesquisa sobre o papel de agências reguladoras para a qualidade dos atendimentos do Serviço Nacional de Saúde, na Inglaterra. Foram identificados 10 motivos que influenciam no funcionamento das instituições reguladoras: o ambiente sociopolítico, governança e responsabilidade, relações externas, clareza dos propósitos, reputação organizacional, liderança e gestão, estabilidade organizacional, recursos, métodos organizacionais e performance organizacional.…”