Setting Parliamentary Calendars: How Parties Allocate Time for Plenary Debates on Bills

Abstract

Compared to other aspects of agenda control, the organisation of legislative calendars has received scarce scholarly attention. However, setting the floor timetable affects parliament's decisions and may therefore become crucial for understanding the policy-making process better. This article examines the allocation of speaking time for plenary debates on bills by combining an interparty perspective with a focus on the agenda-setting powers of collective directing bodies in the parliament. It shows that, due to time pressures, parties have to make explicit trade-offs among bill proposals. Using an original dataset including information about 472 bill proposals scheduled for floor debates in three Italian legislative terms in the period 2001-13, the article provides evidence that parties agree to schedule longer debates for divisive and salient issues, while they decide to move more quickly on less divisive proposals.

All Votes are Equal? Significant Legislation and Party Competition in the Danish Folketing

“…This has recently been demonstrated by Giannetti et al. () in their analysis of time allocation for plenary debates in the Italian parliament, where they found that there are longer debates on issues that are divisive and salient than on issue that are less divisive. In connection with the findings of Proksch and Slapin (), we argue that this is evidence that solving the plenary bottleneck entails parties making strategic choices of which bills to debate, and devote more time to significant legislation.…”

Economic crisis and lawmaking. The impact of crisis on legislative agenda in Italy

“…Both in the Chamber and in the Senate, the CGC is convened by the President of the assembly and has the task of defining the list of topics that the parliament will debate, identifying policy priorities and the period in which they will be included in the order of the day of the assembly. Finally, detailed legislation to be debated enters short-term "calendars", which also include information on the amount of time to be allocated for the discussion of each bill proposal (Giannetti, Pinto and Pedrazzani 2016).…”

Disseminating legislative debates: How legislators communicate the parliamentary agenda

“…Yet, once divisive issues emerge on the legislative agenda, such issues get more floor time. This is true for divisiveness within the coalition ( Martin and Vanberg, 2008 ) and for the legislature as a whole ( Giannetti et al, 2016 ).…”