Setting Health Care Services Tariffs in Iran: Half a Century Quest for a Window of Opportunity

Abstract

Background: The process of medical tariffs setting in Iran remains to be a contentious issue and is heavily criticized by many stakeholders. This paper explores the experience of setting health care services tariffs in the Iranian health care system over the last five decades. Methods: We analyzed data collected through literature review and reviews of the official documents developed at the various levels of the Iranian health system using inductive and deductive content analysis. Twenty-two face-to-face semi-structured interviews supplemented the analysis. Data were analysed and interpreted using 'policy triangle' and 'garbage can' models.Results: Our comprehensive review of changes in the medical tariff setting provides valuable lessons for major stakeholders. Most changes were implemented in a sporadic, inadequate, and a non-evidence-based manner. Disparities in tariffs between public and private sectors continue to exist. Lack of clarity in tariffs setting mechanisms and its process makes negotiations between various stakeholders difficult and can potentially become a source of a corrupt income. Such clarity can be achieved by using fair and technically sound tariffs. Technical aspects of tariff setting should be separated from the political negotiations over the overall payment to the medical professionals. Transparency regarding a conflict of interest and establishing punitive measures against those violating the rules could help improving trust in the doctor-patient relationship. Conclusion: Use of evidence-informed models and methods in medical tariff setting could help to strike the right balance in the process of health care services provision to address health system objectives. A sensitive application of policy models can offer significant insights into the nature of medical tariff setting and highlight existing constraints and opportunities. This study generates lessons learned in tariffs setting, particularly for low- and middle-income countries.

<p>Monitoring Process Barriers and Enablers Towards Universal Health Coverage Within the Sustainable Development Goals: A Systematic Review and Content Analysis</p>

“…Adequate health insurance system can prevent the catastrophic and impoverishing effects of the out-of-pocket payments and thus protect people from the financial burden of disease. 95,97 Different countries use different types of health insurance such as national health insurance, 98,99 and social health insurance 100,101 that covers and protects the population against financial risks. 91,102,103 In Southeast Asian countries, reductions of out-of-pocket payments, increasing accumulation of funding for health, tax-based health care sector financing, ensuring equitable distribution of human resources, and focusing on the reduction of unnecessary health expenditure were identified as key mechanisms and tools in achieving UHC.…”

The Influence of Covid-19 Preparedness Through Health Care Implementation on Ship Crew

“…Patients should get proper care from health workers. 16 Attention is one sign that health workers care about the patient's condition. The preparedness officers at the Belawan Port are less communicative in interacting with the crew, it was dominated by male officers, and appear to be less attentive so that the services provided are not optimal.…”

Decomposed Trends of Iranian Private Health Expenditures: Should Inequality be Appreciated?

“…2 utes (31%), OPHP (35%), private health insurance (6%), and individual donations and other sources (4%) (2). According to the World Health Organization, about 40% of the global health care services are financed through OPHP.…”