My introduction to cross-cultural personality study began when I was a graduate student and was facilitated by Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) stories and Rorschach protocols from Chinese students (Dana, 1959a). I learned from this process that in using cross-cultural interpretation of projective techniques, one could not assume that the meanings of scores and inferences were invariant and universal; they were instead culture specific and could be understood only by a n immersion in the culture. A dissatisfaction with psychiatric diagnoses of multicultural people led to my awareness that the TAT can provide information on the cultural self. This information is relevant for descriptions of cultural identity or cultural conflict and is necessary for the cultural formulations now required to increase the reliability and accuracy of a diagnosis using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed. [ D S M -M ; American Psychiatric Association, 1994).In all of these ventures with the TAT cards, my former teacher, Silvan Tomkins's (1947) exquisite distillation of a methodology for examining the richness of a person has remained with me to guide my interpretations in reports that can be shared with assessees and subsequently amplified by their own self-understanding.