“…Indeed, the lack of overlap between SETDB2 targets identified in E2A-PBX1 + cells and those reported in mouse bone-marrow-derived macrophages ( Schliehe et al, 2015 ), or a gastric cancer cell line ( Nishikawaji et al, 2016 ), suggests that SETDB2 downstream targets are highly dependent on biological context, but the specific mechanisms for SETDB2 recruitment to the respective chromatin sites have not been determined. Furthermore, although SETDB2 has been shown to methylate substrate H3K9me2 peptide in vitro ( Falandry et al, 2010 ), a recent report showed that SETDB2 can positively regulate specific targets independent of its H3K9me3 methyltransferase activity ( Roqueta-Rivera et al, 2016 ). However, this does not appear to apply to the maintenance of leukemias, since several of our observations support a requirement for methyltransferase activity including the following: (1) H3K9me3 methylation state and expression of the CDKN2C gene were reciprocally modulated in parallel by changes in SETDB2 expression, (2) disruption of the SET domain by CRISPR caused deleterious effects, and (3) the functional consequences of SETDB2 overexpression on leukemia cell maintenance required its SET domain ( Figure 5L ).…”