2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2102.13591
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Set theoretic Yang-Baxter equation, braces and Drinfeld twists

Anastasia Doikou

Abstract: We consider involutive, non-degenerate, finite set theoretic solutions of the Yang-Baxter equation. Such solutions can be always obtained using certain algebraic structures that generalize nil potent rings called braces.Our main aim here is to express such solutions in terms of admissible Drinfeld twists substantially extending recent preliminary results. We first identify the generic form of the twists associated to set theoretic solutions and we show that these twists are admissible, i.e. they satisfy a cert… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [3], it is stated that any involutive YBE solution can be viewed as a quasi-admissible twist of the permutation solution. Although [3] is discussing linear Hopf algebras built on these solutions, the proof of Proposition 3.13 of [3] boils down to the following observation: if r(x, y) = (σ x (y), γ y (x)) satisfies the YBE we can introduce F (x, y) = (x, σ x (y)), Φ(x, y, z) = (x, σ x (y), σ γy (x) (z)) and Ψ(x, y, z) = (x, y, σ x (σ y (z))), so that the triple (F, Φ, Ψ) define a Drinfeld twist on (X, r). Conditions (T1), (T2) and (T3), all follow directly from r being a YBE solution and the identities σ σx(y) (σ γx(y) (z)) = σ x (σ y (z)) and σ γ σy (z) (x) (γ z (y)) = γ σx(y) (σ γy(x) (z)).…”
Section: Twists On Skew Bracesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In [3], it is stated that any involutive YBE solution can be viewed as a quasi-admissible twist of the permutation solution. Although [3] is discussing linear Hopf algebras built on these solutions, the proof of Proposition 3.13 of [3] boils down to the following observation: if r(x, y) = (σ x (y), γ y (x)) satisfies the YBE we can introduce F (x, y) = (x, σ x (y)), Φ(x, y, z) = (x, σ x (y), σ γy (x) (z)) and Ψ(x, y, z) = (x, y, σ x (σ y (z))), so that the triple (F, Φ, Ψ) define a Drinfeld twist on (X, r). Conditions (T1), (T2) and (T3), all follow directly from r being a YBE solution and the identities σ σx(y) (σ γx(y) (z)) = σ x (σ y (z)) and σ γ σy (z) (x) (γ z (y)) = γ σx(y) (σ γy(x) (z)).…”
Section: Twists On Skew Bracesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe that σ y (γ σ −1 x (y) (x)) appears in the first component of r 2 (x, σ −1 x (y)). Going back to the involutive setting considered in [3], we have that F rF −1 (x, y) = (y, x), since r 2 = id X 2 . Therefore, the permutation solution (X, fl X ) is obtained from a twist on (X, r), and by Theorem 2.2, (X, r) can be obtained by the inverse twist on (X, fl X ).…”
Section: Twists On Skew Bracesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations