2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2018.8431469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Set-Theoretic Detection of Bias Injection Cyber-Attacks on Networked Power Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper elaborates on previous results of the authors [17,18]. In this work, the use of set-theoretic attack detectors is expanded on a networked power system and their efficiency is assessed considering both persistent and intermittent data corruption attack patterns on the frequency measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This paper elaborates on previous results of the authors [17,18]. In this work, the use of set-theoretic attack detectors is expanded on a networked power system and their efficiency is assessed considering both persistent and intermittent data corruption attack patterns on the frequency measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The algorithms used for the calculation of the robust invariant sets, and thus for the design of the set-theoretic detectors, involve discrete-time systems [26,27]. In this work, we aim to develop an estimation-based detector and then combine it with a set-theoretic one.…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown that the only way to quantify the discrepancies of the estimation residue is to exploit the safety constraints of the state variables and resort to set-theoretic methods. In addition, we prove that we are mathematically inclined to determine the robust invariant set based not on the dynamics of the estimator but based on the dynamics of the system itself, inevitably resorting to the detectors developed in [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations