Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage

Abstract

Because of its inherently asymmetric nature, set-theoretic analysis offers many interesting contrasts with analysis based on correlations. Until recently, however, social scientists have been slow to embrace set-theoretic approaches. The perception was that this type of analysis is restricted to primitive, binary variables and that it has little or no tolerance for error. With the advent of ''fuzzy'' sets and the recognition that even rough set-theoretic relations are relevant to theory, these old barriers have crumbled. This paper advances the set-theoretic approach by presenting simple descriptive measures that can be used to evaluate set-theoretic relationships, especially relations between fuzzy sets. The first measure, ''consistency,'' assesses the degree to which a subset relation has been approximated, whereas the second measure, ''coverage,'' assesses the empirical relevance of a consistent subset. This paper demonstrates further that set-theoretic coverage can be partitioned in a manner somewhat analogous to the partitioning of explained variation in multiple regression analysis.

Institutional complexity and social entrepreneurship: A fuzzy-set approach

“…The final analysis, sensitivity analysis, examines whether the findings are robust to the use of alternative specifications of causal conditions (Ragin 2006). All tests corroborate the robustness of the results.…”

“…This study conducts a confirmatory necessity analysis with presence and absence of institutional conditions to corroborate these results. Table 4 portraits the results of the confirmatory necessity analysis: no condition surpasses the adequate consistency level (0.95) to be a necessary condition or the minimum acceptable consistency level (0.8) to be a partially necessary condition (Ragin, 2006). Therefore, complementary institutional conditions are necessary to form strong opportunity confidence in social entrepreneurship.…”

Explaining travellers online information satisfaction: A complexity theory approach on information needs, barriers, sources and personal characteristics

“…According to Ragin's recommendation, a consistency threshold should not be less than 0.75 [77]. In this study, we set the consistency threshold at 0.90.…”

“…Thus, solutions that do not adhere to this threshold are not included in the analysis. Because of the large sample size, a minimum of five cases for each solution is set [77]. Having set these parameters, the fsQCA analysis is performed using information satisfaction as the dependent variable.…”

The Internal Social Sustainability of Sanitation Infrastructure

“…In other words, 41% of the sustainable household cases are represented by these pathways. This is a low coverage that suggests there is not a set theoretic relationship 49 . To improve the analysis, the status construct was added to the analysis.…”