2012
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2011.2168073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Set-Membership Error-in-Variables Identification Through Convex Relaxation Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the nature of regressor quantization and the characterization of noise in terms of deterministic bounds, make the problem amenable to the set membership approach, although important developments have been made also in the stochastic setting (see, e.g., [9], [12]- [14]) or even in a mixed stochastic/deterministic framework [15], [16]. When considering ARX models in this quantized information setting [17], or OE and EiV models in general [18], [19], one is faced with a problem with perturbed regressors. In these cases, the nice property of convexity of the FPS is generally lost, so that almost all of the methods and techniques proposed for the standard linear regression formulation do not apply.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the nature of regressor quantization and the characterization of noise in terms of deterministic bounds, make the problem amenable to the set membership approach, although important developments have been made also in the stochastic setting (see, e.g., [9], [12]- [14]) or even in a mixed stochastic/deterministic framework [15], [16]. When considering ARX models in this quantized information setting [17], or OE and EiV models in general [18], [19], one is faced with a problem with perturbed regressors. In these cases, the nice property of convexity of the FPS is generally lost, so that almost all of the methods and techniques proposed for the standard linear regression formulation do not apply.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still in an OE context, in [28] of both approaches is that the approximation procedure does not explicitly account for regressor sequential correlation, giving rise to quite conservative results whenever such correlation is present. More recently, in [19], [29] an EiV formulation has been considered in which all the regressor variables are subject to bounded noises. For this general setting, a procedure is provided to derive parameter uncertainty intervals, i.e., bounds on the nonconvex FPS, based on a sequence of problem relaxations leading to linear matrix inequalities and using the sparsity of the resulting relaxed problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimate θ 1 c computed by solving (29) is the so-called ℓ p -Chebyshev center of D θ 1 , also called central estimate in the SM literature. In the case p = ∞, the central estimate is the center of the minimum-volume-box outerbounding D θ 1 and can be computed by exploiting the convex relaxation approach proposed in Cerone, Piga, and Regruto (2012). Although the central estimate provides the minimum of the worst-case estimation error, it may show some undesirable features in this case, since the set D θ 1 is nonconvex.…”
Section: A Bounded-error Approach To Laser Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of current error-in-variables methods are aimed at linear systems (see [18], [4] and references therein). An exception is the work in [6], extending the idea of [15] to cases with measurement noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%