1962
DOI: 10.1037/h0041505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Set applied to student teaching.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1963
1963
1976
1976

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wittrock (1962) concluded that set operated on the behaviors of teacher candidates. Davis and Bowers (1961) reported that data that indicated training of future teachers in terms of specific kinds of learnings appeared to have positive effects.…”
Section: Task and Methods Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wittrock (1962) concluded that set operated on the behaviors of teacher candidates. Davis and Bowers (1961) reported that data that indicated training of future teachers in terms of specific kinds of learnings appeared to have positive effects.…”
Section: Task and Methods Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c. The stimulation arising from reinstatement of a specific set to achieve the to-be-learned behavior, the performance set. The importance of this component of the stimulus situation is suggested by research on "informing the learner of the learning objective" (Mager & McCann, 1962;Wittrock, 1962). The operation of the performance set is not yet well understood (Anderson, 1967, p. 130;Gagné, 1970, p. 307).…”
Section: The Stimulus Situation For Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wittrock (1962) studied the effec tiveness of directions provided for the teacher. Wittrock (1962) studied the effec tiveness of directions provided for the teacher.…”
Section: External Inputs-conditions External To the Teachermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In working with student teachers, Wittrock (1962) found that those who were told that their final course grades would depend on the amount of pupil gain in achievement produced actually did produce significantly more pupil gain than did a control group of student teachers who did not receive the set involving reward for pupil gain. Ryans (1960b) summarily reviewed the problem of the prediction of teacher effectiveness.…”
Section: Pupil Achievement and Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%