2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2207.08904
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seshadri stratifications and Schubert varieties: a geometric construction of a standard monomial theory

Abstract: A standard monomial theory for Schubert varieties is constructed exploiting (1) the geometry of the Seshadri stratifications of Schubert varieties by their Schubert subvarieties and (2) the combinatorial LS-path character formula for Demazure modules. The general theory of Seshadri stratifications is improved by using arbitrary linearization of the partial order and by weakening the definition of balanced stratification.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all the bonds b p,q , p covering q in A, fullfill the gcd conditions on chains as is proved in [9,Corollary 4.8] (the proof of Corollary 4.8 in [9] is for the application to Schubert varieties, however the same proof holds for arbitrary stratification of LS-type). So (1) is proved.…”
Section: From Seshadri Stratifications To Ls-algebrasmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First of all the bonds b p,q , p covering q in A, fullfill the gcd conditions on chains as is proved in [9,Corollary 4.8] (the proof of Corollary 4.8 in [9] is for the application to Schubert varieties, however the same proof holds for arbitrary stratification of LS-type). So (1) is proved.…”
Section: From Seshadri Stratifications To Ls-algebrasmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It is not hard to see that there are only 14 of them (see also [14, Table 1]) with a = (1, 1, 1, 1), (1, 1, 1, 3), (1, 1, 2, 2), (1, 1, 2, 4), (1,1,4,6), (1,2,2,5), (1,2,3,6), (1,2,6,9), (1,3,4,4), (1,3,8,12), (1,4,5,10), (1,6,14,21), (2,3,3,4), (2,3,10,15).…”
Section: An Example Where the Components Are Not Weighted Projective ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation