1997
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0016009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SESAM: A biometric person identification system using sensor fusion

Abstract: In this paper we describe the person authentification system SESAM. Person identification and verification still is a very difficult task. Using one biometric feature, i. e. the photograph or the sound of the voice, leads to good results, but there is no reliable way to verify the classification. In order to reach robust identification and verification we are combining three different biometric cues. These cues are dynamic, i. e. the sound of the voice and the lip motion, and static, i. e. the fixed image of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…8. We see that states at the ends (states 1-3 and 18-20) and at the middle (9)(10)(11)(12) has the largest scatters, indicating that these gait stances carry the bulk of the discriminatory power. The mean stances for these states are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Stance Selectionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8. We see that states at the ends (states 1-3 and 18-20) and at the middle (9)(10)(11)(12) has the largest scatters, indicating that these gait stances carry the bulk of the discriminatory power. The mean stances for these states are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Stance Selectionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Fusion can be done at three levels [39]: 1. The feature extraction level, where data from each sensor are: combined to form one feature vector [12,5]. 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of bat calls is achieved with an algorithm termed SC-MELT (Wagner et al 1995;Hogg & Talhami 1996;Dieckmann 1997 Apart from the raw classification rates we also calculated recognition rates with a filter criteria, which rejected classifications with maximum scalar product values smaller than 0.6 or with a difference to the next best scalar product of less than 0.2. We then tried to optimize the training base by picking from every species the calls from those random sets, which had achieved the highest classification rates.…”
Section: Synergeticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the development of biometrics and its machinesupported implementation, this method is nowadays widely used, whether applied by popular electronics or highly sophisticated devices and equipment [2], [5]. We have already analyzed biometric features and achieved results were published in [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%