2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.csndt.2014.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serviceability assessment of the Góis footbridge using vibration monitoring

Abstract: Footbridges are structures that may experience vibration amplification problems caused by pedestrian and/or wind actions. Design codes deal with these phenomena limiting the natural frequencies and the maximum accelerations expected. Aiming at taking into consideration these dynamic phenomena, current procedures to evaluate the structural performance of light-weight bridges based on experimental dynamic analysis are evaluated in this study. To achieve this, the dynamic response of three pedestrians walking, ru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accelerations observed in Figure 10, show acceptable magnitudes, since their behavior is similar with the values obtained in [27], where they are compared with the codes shown there, this indicates that the system remains in a state of adequate service, and does not present significant levels of instability, the authors refer that the codes future be will stricter [16], and that the designs comply with this regulations [13][14], the normative British National Annex Eurocode, SÉTRA, HIVOSS, AASHTO, LRDF in [6] refers to critical magnitudes, however, we recommend that according to the satisfactory results obtained, be compared and monitored in the future, with traffics different from the proposed, whose classification was focused on the type TC2, as used in [28], whose density (D = 0.2 pedestrians per square meter) is presented in the dynamic system block diagram.…”
Section: B Study Of the Load Patternssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The accelerations observed in Figure 10, show acceptable magnitudes, since their behavior is similar with the values obtained in [27], where they are compared with the codes shown there, this indicates that the system remains in a state of adequate service, and does not present significant levels of instability, the authors refer that the codes future be will stricter [16], and that the designs comply with this regulations [13][14], the normative British National Annex Eurocode, SÉTRA, HIVOSS, AASHTO, LRDF in [6] refers to critical magnitudes, however, we recommend that according to the satisfactory results obtained, be compared and monitored in the future, with traffics different from the proposed, whose classification was focused on the type TC2, as used in [28], whose density (D = 0.2 pedestrians per square meter) is presented in the dynamic system block diagram.…”
Section: B Study Of the Load Patternssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…From a structural point of view, special attention may be required by pedestrian systems which can be more sensitive to walk-induced effects compared to other structural typologies. Traditional vibration serviceability assessment is based on consolidated structural health monitoring procedures and techniques [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Recently, various studies have started to assess the dynamic behaviour of laminated glass slabs under pedestrians, showing that structural dynamic parameters and performance indicators are rather different from other constructional solutions, as a major effect of flexibility, slenderness and (often) limited mass, compared to occupants [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem especially concerns new structures designed using new construction solutions and materials. This is due to the fact that the vibration frequencies of the modern footbridges are often close to the frequencies which are induced by pedestrians [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The well-known examples of footbridges that experienced excessive vibrations during exploitation are the Millenium bridge in London [10][11][12], the Solferino bridge in Paris [13,14], and the Mape Valley Great Suspension Bridge [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%