Service user experiences of a psychologically enhanced resettlement service [PERS] in an English open prison

Jarvis, Dannii; Shaw, Jake; Lovell, Tamsin

doi:10.1108/jfp-11-2021-0061

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 25 publications

(37 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, these may include Mentalisation Based Treatment services or Male-Trauma Recovery Empowerment Model services (154). ‘Psychologically enhanced resettlement services’, another component of the OPD pathway, also offer support either within prisons or within the community, and aim to support the transition-in, graduation, and transition-out of open conditions (155).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Alternative approaches to standard inpatient mental health care: development of a typology of service models

Griffiths,

Baldwin,

Vasikaran

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundInpatient mental health care is a challenging component of the mental health services system, with frequent reports of negative and coercive experiences and doubts about its therapeutic value. As such, alternative approaches for individuals experiencing a mental health crisis are highly desirable. This research aimed to identify models which offer an alternative to standard inpatient mental health care across all age groups, both nationally and internationally, and to develop a typology for these alternative models.MethodsA dual literature search and expert consultation research methodology was adopted to identify relevant models. Three typologies of models were developed according to age group and acuity, including: alternatives to standard acute inpatient services for adults; alternatives to longer-stay inpatient services for adults, including rehabilitation and forensic inpatient services; and alternatives to standard inpatient services for children and young people.ResultsWe identified an array of service models in each typology, some in community settings, some hospital-based and some working across settings. Models varied greatly in characteristics, extent of implementation and supporting evidence.ConclusionsThrough this mapping exercise, we have developed three novel typologies of alternatives to standard inpatient care. A range of community-based, hospital-based and cross-setting approaches were identified. The identification of services providing inpatient care in a substantially different way to the standard suggests that some improvements could be provided within existing structures. Potential inequities in access to alternatives were identified for certain groups, such as people who are compulsorily detained, younger children and young people transitioning between children’s and adult services. These typologies can inform future description, evaluation and comparison of different service models. This research also yields some key considerations for the design, development and implementation of alternative mental health service models and service arrays.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%