Abstract:The basic purpose of the current study was to investigate the relationship between service quality and student's satisfaction using HEdPERF model. The present study selected 384 respondents from 28 universities of Khyber Pakhunkhwa (Pakistan) using proportionate stratified random sampling method. The data was analysed with the help of SPSS and AMOS to measure service quality and student's satisfaction in higher education industry. The Factor Analysis and Parallel Analysis were also applied for purification of … Show more
“…As as result of the literature review, it is seen that the number of studies using HEdPERF scale is increasing day by day (Ali, Shariff, Said & Mat, 2018;Ali et al, 2016;Ada, Baysal & Erkan, 2017;Banahene, Kraa & Kasu, 2018;Damaris, Surip & Setyadi, 2019;Deveci & Aymankuy, 2017;Firdaus, 2006;Firdaus, 2019;Khalid, Ali & Makhbul, 2019;Lazibat et al, 2014;Mang'unyi & Govender, 2014;Mekic & Mekic, 2016;Muhammad, Kakakhel, Baloch & Ali, (TKA, 2010: 5-73;TKA, 2013: 19-89). This study is intended to identify how tourism students at these three aforementioned universities view the service quality of institutions of higher education.…”
The service quality levels of the three higher education institutions in the TR21 Thrace region were found to be slightly above the middle level (x̄3.41). Carried out to identify the link between the sub-dimensions of the higher education service quality scale, the correlation analysis revealed a strong positive relationship. Initially, a Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed to establish construct validity of the higher education service quality scale, followed by a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). As a result of the analysis, it was found that the 6 dimension structure at the scale was verified. It was determined that the obtained compliance values were within the accepted values in the literature. HEdPERF
“…As as result of the literature review, it is seen that the number of studies using HEdPERF scale is increasing day by day (Ali, Shariff, Said & Mat, 2018;Ali et al, 2016;Ada, Baysal & Erkan, 2017;Banahene, Kraa & Kasu, 2018;Damaris, Surip & Setyadi, 2019;Deveci & Aymankuy, 2017;Firdaus, 2006;Firdaus, 2019;Khalid, Ali & Makhbul, 2019;Lazibat et al, 2014;Mang'unyi & Govender, 2014;Mekic & Mekic, 2016;Muhammad, Kakakhel, Baloch & Ali, (TKA, 2010: 5-73;TKA, 2013: 19-89). This study is intended to identify how tourism students at these three aforementioned universities view the service quality of institutions of higher education.…”
The service quality levels of the three higher education institutions in the TR21 Thrace region were found to be slightly above the middle level (x̄3.41). Carried out to identify the link between the sub-dimensions of the higher education service quality scale, the correlation analysis revealed a strong positive relationship. Initially, a Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed to establish construct validity of the higher education service quality scale, followed by a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). As a result of the analysis, it was found that the 6 dimension structure at the scale was verified. It was determined that the obtained compliance values were within the accepted values in the literature. HEdPERF
“…Reinforcing these findings, another study stated….. SQ (service quality) is a vital factor that determines the level of SS (student satisfaction)… (Wei, 2011), that good service quality will result in happy customers and costumers' repeat order for the previous services (Prentice & Kadan, 2019). Good service quality makes consumers feel more attached to the services provided (Kumar et al, 2018), and therefore, it is certain that students will be satisfied with the quality of service (Muhammad, Kakakhel, Baloch, & Ali, 2018b). Therefore, higher education managers should continuously examine their ability to provide quality services to students from various quality service dimensions (Onditi & Wechuli, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, student satisfaction is determined by various aspects such as: academic aspects, non-academic aspects, access aspects, or communication aspects, problem solving aspects in the study program and the institution's reputation aspects. (Muhammad et al, 2018b). Non-academic aspects relate to the ability of the academic staff to assist and serve the needs of students: Academic aspects refer to the ability of the academic staff to convey the best knowledge and experience to students: Dimension access refers to the availability to be in contact with and to be approached by students.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dimension of reputation refers to students' perceptions of the university they study at (Muhammad et al, 2018b). No less important, student pay back for the university has an effect on student satisfaction (Tuan, 2012).…”
<pre><span lang="EN-US">One of the roles of the university is to support national education goals as part of educating students.<span class="tlid-translation"> Student satisfaction is an important variable for the existence and sustainability of a university, especially a private universities.This research aims to analyze the effect of lecturer service quality on student satisfaction.</span>This research uses quantitative research with survey methods. <span class="tlid-translation">The population of this research were students of a private university at Universitas Pakuan with 543 respondents. The findings of this research were that there was a positive and significant influence between the lecturer service quality on student satisfaction. This means that efforts to increase student satisfaction can be done by improving the quality of lecturer services. Meanwhile, from the 5 dimensions of lecturer service quality, it was found that the empathy dimension had the greatest influence compared to other dimensions of lecturer service quality</span>.</span></pre>
“…The study found that service quality, particularly the dimensions of academic aspects, reputation, and program issues, impacted students' satisfaction. Finally, Muhammad et al (2018) investigated the effect of service quality on students' satisfaction for 384 students from 28 universities in Pakistan. They found that service quality, especially the dimensions of academic aspects, nonacademic aspects, reputation and access, were significant predictors of students' satisfaction.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.