Service quality in P2P streaming systems

Moltchanov, Dmitri

doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2011.09.003

Cited by 12 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 101 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In P2P video streaming, the effects of loss can be propagated in the whole overlay which leads to low video quality on receivers [1]. In order to cope with this problem, packet loss recovery is a conventional method in video streaming [13]. There are three types of packet loss recovery methods in video streaming including ARQ [15], FEC [17] and hybrid ARQ [2].…”

Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Adaptive Packet Loss Recovery Method for Peer-to-Peer Video Streaming Over Wireless Mesh Network

Ghaeini

Akbari

Barekatain

2013

Emerging Technologies for Information Systems, Computing, and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

P2P video streaming over WMN includes different multimedia applications such as IPTV, video surveillance and video conferencing. It also introduces some challenges such as required level of QoS. Packet loss recovery methods can improve the experienced amount of QoS which leads to better video quality on peers. Although ARQ and FEC methods have been used in many video streaming applications, they are unable to provide enough level of QoS in P2P video streaming over WMN. Hybrid methods improve the performances of packet loss recovery schemes. But they do not carefully consider the characteristics of the source and the destination nodes, thus are not suitable for P2P video streaming over WMN. Therefore, in this study, an adaptive packet loss recovery method is proposed to select the loss recovery policy according to the source and the destination characteristics and loss probability of communication.

show abstract

Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Adaptive Packet Loss Recovery Method for Peer-to-Peer Video Streaming Over Wireless Mesh Network

Ghaeini

Akbari

Barekatain

2013

Emerging Technologies for Information Systems, Computing, and Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some issues are described in [6] and [7] such as: (i) the types of P2P networks for video streaming applications, (ii) the heterogeneity of peers and (iii) the inherent dynamics in P2P networks. Previously, proposal by [8] describes some problem with P2P such as: streaming cost, maximum delay and throughput, also work by [9] and [10] showed a problem in content replication.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

IoT Smart Device for e-Learning Content Sharing on Hybrid Cloud Environment

Idris¹,

Stiawan²,

Habibullah³

et al. 2017

EECSI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Centralized e-Learning technology has dominated the learning ecosystem that brings a lot of potential usage on media rich learning materials. However, the centralized architecture has their own constraint to support large number of users for accessing large size of learning contents. On the other hand, Content Delivery Network (CDN) solution which relies on distributed architecture provides an alternative solution to eliminate bottleneck access. Although CDN is an effective solution, the implementation of technology is expensive and has less impact for student who lives in limited or non-existence internet access in geographical area. In this paper, we introduce an IoT smart device to provide e-Learning access for content sharing on hybrid cloud environment with distributed peer-topeer communication solution for data synchronization and updates. The IoT smart device acts as an intermediate device between user and cloud services, and provides content sharing solution without fully depending on the cloud server.

show abstract

“…1(b). The resulting system is a single hop wireless network, where the communications delay equals to the time to transmit a packet over the air interface [24]. Despite the fact, MAC layer protocol for wireless system might add a considerable power consupsion [17], [19], [20] and delay [18], [21], we rely on the THz channel characteristics being sufficient for handling this issue.…”

Section: Proposed Architecturesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance comparison of selected wired and wireless networks on chip architectures

Komar

2015

2015 17th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper we compare performance intra-core communications in network on chips. We consider two alternative architectures, wired and wireless. The wired on is based on a common bus (ring) with all the cores attached to it. We compare it to the mesh (point-to-point) architecture based on THz wireless links operating in 0.1 − 0.54 frequency band. Using reference latencies of inter-core communications in modern CPUs we perform an applicability assessment of considered schemes. As performance metrics of interest we consider both delay and capacity. Our results indicate that the latter architecture outperforms the former by a singificant margin. The proposed system can be realized implementing directional antennas at all cores and ensuring that cores are placed on a chip such that there is no interference between them.

show abstract

Service quality in P2P streaming systems

Cited by 12 publications

References 101 publications

An Adaptive Packet Loss Recovery Method for Peer-to-Peer Video Streaming Over Wireless Mesh Network

An Adaptive Packet Loss Recovery Method for Peer-to-Peer Video Streaming Over Wireless Mesh Network

IoT Smart Device for e-Learning Content Sharing on Hybrid Cloud Environment

Performance comparison of selected wired and wireless networks on chip architectures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About