2018
DOI: 10.1080/10511253.2018.1488983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Service-Learning and Experiential Learning in Criminal Justice Education: An Exploratory Examination of Faculty Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent study examining a national sample of faculty’ perceptions of experiential learning, less than 25% of faculty surveyed used experiential learning approaches and the majority (91%) used traditional lectures (Wurdinger & Allison, 2017). Although 97% of faculty indicated they felt experiential learning enhances students’ life skills (e.g., critical thinking, problem-solving), more than half indicated barriers to implementation, including lack of time and resources (Wurdinger & Allison, 2017; see also Skaggs & Graybeal, 2019). Such constraints may be particularly salient among BIPOC, women, and other marginalized educators who too often bear the brunt of service work and mentorship (Guarino & Borden, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study examining a national sample of faculty’ perceptions of experiential learning, less than 25% of faculty surveyed used experiential learning approaches and the majority (91%) used traditional lectures (Wurdinger & Allison, 2017). Although 97% of faculty indicated they felt experiential learning enhances students’ life skills (e.g., critical thinking, problem-solving), more than half indicated barriers to implementation, including lack of time and resources (Wurdinger & Allison, 2017; see also Skaggs & Graybeal, 2019). Such constraints may be particularly salient among BIPOC, women, and other marginalized educators who too often bear the brunt of service work and mentorship (Guarino & Borden, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%