2015
DOI: 10.1111/sjpe.12092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Service Deregulation, Competition, and the Performance of French and Italian Firms

Abstract: We use firm-level data for France and Italy to explore the impact of service regulation reform implemented in the two countries on the mark-up and eventually on the performance of firms between the second half of the 1990s and 2007. We find that the relation between entry barriers and productivity is negative and is crucially intermediated through the firm's mark up. If both countries adopted OECD's best practices in terms of entry barriers, their TFP level would increase by 3% for Italy and 3.5% for France.JE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2019), Daveri et al. (2016), Orazem and Vodopivec (2009), Hay and Liu (1997)). In comparison, columns (2) and (4) suggest concave relationships between productivity and Lerner indexes, implying that marginal effects generally decrease with the size of relevant Lerner indexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(2019), Daveri et al. (2016), Orazem and Vodopivec (2009), Hay and Liu (1997)). In comparison, columns (2) and (4) suggest concave relationships between productivity and Lerner indexes, implying that marginal effects generally decrease with the size of relevant Lerner indexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2021), Daveri et al. (2016), Demsetz (1973)). Similarly, endogeneity of real total assets also arises due to simultaneity, as higher efficiency provides more funds to expand.…”
Section: Empirical Strategy and Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that reformed countries experienced a more increased productivity related to the non-reformed countries and that contribution to productivity growth due to competition spurred by entry reforms is between 12% and 15%. Daveri et al (2010) empirically investigate the effects of entry regulation implemented in France and Italy over the 1998-2007 period on the firms' mark-up and productivity. They use firm-level data on both countries to compute the productivity indicator and then, as a proxy for regulation, they use the OECD product market regulation indicator for retail, professional services, transport and communication.…”
Section: Competition and Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labour productivity growth in retailing was 0.8 percent per year in 1995-2002 compared with 7.4 per cent in the United States and 1.6 per cent in the EU15 (McGuckin et al 2005). It is clear that productivity performance was still impaired by regulation; barriers to entry and mark-ups in retailing remained high on average with adverse consequences for TFP (Daveri et al 2010). However, in districts where competition was stimulated by the 1998 regulatory reform both ICT investment and labour productivity increased (Schivardi and Viviano 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%