2018
DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2018.1529659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Servants of a ‘sinking titanic’ or actors of change? Contested identities of social workers in Sweden

Abstract: View related articlesView Crossmark data Citing articles: 8 View citing articles Servants of a 'sinking titanic' or actors of change? Contested identities of social workers in Sweden Passiva tjänare av 'ett sjunkande skepp' eller förändringsaktörer? Ifrågasatta identiteter hos socialarbetare i Sverige

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
20
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is important to recognise how quickly these programmes were introduced and have expanded in England, and there are a number of contemporary developments that mean that this experience could be replicated elsewhere without adequate resistance. Fast-track social work education models stem from a neoliberal ideological perspective (Jones, 2019), and the increasing influence of neoliberalism in social work and social work education across Europe could gradually create a climate that is more amenable to these models (Albuquerque, 2019;Herrero & Charnley, 2019;Jonsson, 2019). The fact that both Think Ahead and Frontline were introduced following reports by the Institute for Public Policy Research, a self-described think tank, should also be considered significant within the contemporary European policy context, where think tanks are seeing an upsurge in influence (Bajenova, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to recognise how quickly these programmes were introduced and have expanded in England, and there are a number of contemporary developments that mean that this experience could be replicated elsewhere without adequate resistance. Fast-track social work education models stem from a neoliberal ideological perspective (Jones, 2019), and the increasing influence of neoliberalism in social work and social work education across Europe could gradually create a climate that is more amenable to these models (Albuquerque, 2019;Herrero & Charnley, 2019;Jonsson, 2019). The fact that both Think Ahead and Frontline were introduced following reports by the Institute for Public Policy Research, a self-described think tank, should also be considered significant within the contemporary European policy context, where think tanks are seeing an upsurge in influence (Bajenova, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medan kritiska perspektiv begränsar sina förändringsambitioner till reformer inom ramen för det rådande kapitalistiska, strukturella och institutionella sammanhanget, syftar radikala perspektiv till grundläggande och revolutionära förändringar av samma strukturella och institutionella sammanhang. Radikalt socialt arbete kan utövas av socialarbetare i vardagliga praktiker (Fenton 2019a;Jönsson 2014Jönsson , 2019 och inkluderar antirasistiska, antidiskriminerande, antiförtryckande och emancipatoriska teorier, metoder och praktiker. Trots att det finns vissa potentiella vetenskapsfilosofiska konflikter inbäddade i en ambition att förena kritiska och radikala perspektiv, ser vi pragmatiskt på saken.…”
Section: Teori: Kritiska Och Radikala Perspektiv I Socialt Arbeteunclassified
“…With neo-liberal changes, particularly with the introduction of new public management within social services during the 1990swith its emphasis on the intensification of work, the measurement of performance in service delivery, and cost efficienciessocial work in Sweden has become predominantly focused on evidence-based clinical practice at individual level (Herz and Johansson, 2011;Jönsson, 2019;Righard and Montesino, 2012). In several European countries (such as Sweden, Finland and Germany), social work is therefore 'entangled in neo-liberal and neo-bureaucratic structures of governance which treat people rather as objects' (Matthies, 2009, p. 326).…”
Section: Students' Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%