2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)00910-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum response factor is modulated by the SUMO-1 conjugation system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expression of c-fos is controlled by serum response factor (SRF) and the ternary complex factor Elk-1, which form a transcription factor complex on the SRE element in the c-fos promoter. Both SRF and Elk-1 undergo SUMO modification and, consistent with a repressive role of SUMO in the AP-1 pathway, transcriptional activity of both SRF and Elk-1 is restrained by SUMOylation (Matsuzaki et al, 2003;Yang et al, 2003). This illustrates that SUMO can inhibit upstream effectors that control the availability of an AP-1 component.…”
Section: Ap-1 Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Expression of c-fos is controlled by serum response factor (SRF) and the ternary complex factor Elk-1, which form a transcription factor complex on the SRE element in the c-fos promoter. Both SRF and Elk-1 undergo SUMO modification and, consistent with a repressive role of SUMO in the AP-1 pathway, transcriptional activity of both SRF and Elk-1 is restrained by SUMOylation (Matsuzaki et al, 2003;Yang et al, 2003). This illustrates that SUMO can inhibit upstream effectors that control the availability of an AP-1 component.…”
Section: Ap-1 Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This result is not totally surprising because it was reported for other proteins. For example, serum response factor, Lef1͞ Tcf, and Smad3 are all sumoylated by PIASy, and their transcriptional activity is inhibited by PIASy coexpression, but in none of these cases does transcriptional repression require sumoylation (20,39,40). In the case of Lef1͞Tcf, interaction with PIASy results in accumulation within subnuclear compartments (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be pointed out that SRF can be modified by phosphorylation, acetylation, and sumoylation, and posttranslationally modified SRF may well exhibit lineage-specific interactions with transcriptional coactivators and corepressors. [91][92][93][94] It is also apparent that SMC differentiation in any lineage requires epigenetic modifications of intact chromatin to enable SRF and its cofactors to gain access to important cis-regulatory sites on SMC target genes. Whether or not lineage-specific chromatin remodeling complexes are formed during vascular SMC development is an important direction for future study.…”
Section: Majeskymentioning
confidence: 99%