1996
DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(96)06278-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum neuron specific enolase (S-NSE) reference interval evaluation by time-resolved immunofluorometry compared with a radioimmunoassay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the performance of lung cancer biomarkers is still debatable in clinical practice, their use for lung cancer diagnosis, therapeutic monitoring, and prognosis prediction is ambiguous, of which is partly because of lacking a rigorous standardized reference interval. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] A reliable reference interval is therefore critical for the performance evaluation of a biomarker. Apart from following the requirements of CLSI EP28-A3C guidelines, this study also considered geography to explore whether physical location influenced outcomes when establishing a reference interval for biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the performance of lung cancer biomarkers is still debatable in clinical practice, their use for lung cancer diagnosis, therapeutic monitoring, and prognosis prediction is ambiguous, of which is partly because of lacking a rigorous standardized reference interval. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] A reliable reference interval is therefore critical for the performance evaluation of a biomarker. Apart from following the requirements of CLSI EP28-A3C guidelines, this study also considered geography to explore whether physical location influenced outcomes when establishing a reference interval for biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein, we describe the correction of NSE reference intervals derived from healthcare individual samples. The NSE reference interval established in our study differs from the previous study . The main reason is that the reference interval of previous study is established according to the strict rules of C28‐A3, but in our research, the data derived from healthcare individuals may include unrecognized slight hemolysis in the serum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The normal range of NSE value in serum of a healthy individual is 4 to 12 ng/mL, 23 and a subject with serum NSE level of >12 ng/mL is generally considered to be undergoing stress of neuronal and/or neuroendocrine cells. 24 Our group of 40 normal adult volunteers showed a mean (SD) value of serum NSE level to be 16.6 ± 2.5 ng/mL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%