2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0304-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum neurofilament dynamics predicts neurodegeneration and clinical progression in presymptomatic Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract: Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a promising fluid biomarker of disease progression for various cerebral proteopathies. Here we leverage the unique characteristics of the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network and ultrasensitive immunoas-say technology to demonstrate that NfL levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (n = 187) and serum (n = 405) are correlated with one another and are elevated at the presymptomatic stages of familial Alzheimer's disease. Longitudinal, withinperson analysis of serum NfL dynamics (n … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

54
616
5
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 661 publications
(682 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
54
616
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This could for, example, also cause the initial increase in CSF NfL that is too subtle to be clinically relevant (early change point; Figs 1A and 2), followed by a more marked change better corresponding to overt neurodegeneration (late change point; Figs 1A and 2). This hypothesis is also in agreement with the contradictory studies showing that subtle longitudinal changes in NfL can be detected 16 years before the onset of cognitive symptoms (Preische et al, 2019), while cross-sectional differences are only noticeable at the MCI and dementia stage (Mattsson et al, 2019a,b). In addition to the validity, the sensitivity of the biomarker (for detecting the underlying pathology) may also affect the results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This could for, example, also cause the initial increase in CSF NfL that is too subtle to be clinically relevant (early change point; Figs 1A and 2), followed by a more marked change better corresponding to overt neurodegeneration (late change point; Figs 1A and 2). This hypothesis is also in agreement with the contradictory studies showing that subtle longitudinal changes in NfL can be detected 16 years before the onset of cognitive symptoms (Preische et al, 2019), while cross-sectional differences are only noticeable at the MCI and dementia stage (Mattsson et al, 2019a,b). In addition to the validity, the sensitivity of the biomarker (for detecting the underlying pathology) may also affect the results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Any of the N biomarkers predicted the longitudinal MMSE; however, it is possible that the clinical progression of the disease could be better explained by the longitudinal change in a concrete biomarker than the basal level . In this sense, again, longitudinal data in repeated samples could provide further evidence of the relationship of biomarkers and cognitive impairment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have begun to investigate plasma biomarkers in AD; however, most have concentrated on detecting AD proteinopathies or neuronal injury . This project aimed to contribute to the characterization of plasma biomarkers in AD, across a wider spectrum of pathways, with a particular interest in extending knowledge of early‐onset AD (EOAD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have begun to investigate plasma biomarkers in AD; however, most have concentrated on detecting AD proteinopathies or neuronal injury. 13,14 This project aimed to contribute to the characterization of plasma biomarkers in AD, across a wider spectrum of pathways, with a particular interest in extending knowledge of early-onset AD (EOAD). Clinical observations suggest a more aggressive disease course in EOAD, 15 although specific molecular differences between sporadic EOAD and late-onset AD (LOAD) remain to be elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%