2012
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.39.6671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum Mesothelin for Diagnosing Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Abstract: A B S T R A C T PurposeMesothelin is currently considered the best available serum biomarker of malignant pleural mesothelioma. To examine the diagnostic accuracy and use of serum mesothelin in early diagnosis, we performed an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. MethodsThe literature search identified 16 diagnostic studies of serum mesothelin, measured with the Mesomark enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. IPD of 4,491 individuals were collected, including several control groups and 1,026 patients with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
171
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(49 reference statements)
7
171
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The low sensitivity will not allow exclusion of non-MM patients even if they have mesothelin concentrations lower than the cutoff value. Thus, it would not be advisable to use a negative mesothelin test to exclude MM, even at a high-specificity threshold [70]. However, for the establishment of the optimal threshold, it should be taken into account that the diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers depends on the distribution of individual characteristics, such as GFR, age, tumour stage and histology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The low sensitivity will not allow exclusion of non-MM patients even if they have mesothelin concentrations lower than the cutoff value. Thus, it would not be advisable to use a negative mesothelin test to exclude MM, even at a high-specificity threshold [70]. However, for the establishment of the optimal threshold, it should be taken into account that the diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers depends on the distribution of individual characteristics, such as GFR, age, tumour stage and histology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no agreement on the diagnostic thresholds of any of the above-mentioned biomarkers, because the reported ''optimal'' thresholds range widely [70]. The establishment of the ''optimal'' diagnostic thresholds is difficult as it depends on the distribution of the aforementioned characteristics of the study population.…”
Section: Effect Of Patient Characteristics On Mesothelin Mpf and Ostmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, surgical tumor reduction is followed by a decrease in SMRP levels 6,35,68 . Numerous studies have reported increased SMRP to be an independent prognostic factors for mesothelioma, with mesothelin levels negatively correlating with survival 31,36,37,63,71,74 . Another area of application of serum mesothelin measurement is monitoring of mesothelioma progression and its response to therapy, with SMRP being increased in disease progression and stable or decreasing SMRP levels being a sign of positive response to therapy 30,53,63,64,70,71,79 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have been performed to assess the utilization of mesothelin in the diagnosis of mesothelioma, reporting a sensitivity of 50-84% and specificity of 72-95% and statistically significantly higher SMRP levels in mesothelioma as compared with healthy exposed individuals or those with benign asbestos-induced conditions 30,31,35,55,[68][69][70][71][72] . Recent meta-analysis reported a sensitivity and specificity of SMRP for mesothelioma of 32-64% and 88-100%, respectively 73,74 . Another finding in many studies was statistically significantly higher mesothelin levels in mesothelioma than in metastatic involvement of the pleura but also statistically significantly higher mesothelin concentrations in metastatic pleural disease compared with asbestos-exposed individuals (healthy and/or with benign disease) (ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among less invasive procedures for the diagnosis, radiographic examinations such as chest roentgenogram and computed tomography (CT) are most commonly employed, but do not provide definitive diagnosis of MM. Blood-based tests may be promising, but the serum mesothelin related protein (SMRP), the only clinically approved blood-test, may not provide sufficient diagnostic sensitivity (8,9). Accordingly, a novel blood-based test for the diagnosis of MM should be established for early diagnosis as well as improvement of prognosis of MM patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%