2018
DOI: 10.1159/000492778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum Lipopolysaccharide-Binding Protein is Associated with Chronic Inflammation and Metabolic Syndrome in Hemodialysis Patients

Abstract: Background: In hemodialysis (HD) patients, impaired gut barrier and alteration in microbiota in the gut is thought to increase the risk of bacterial translocation and chronic inflammation. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) is an acute-phase reactant that mediates immune responses triggered by microbial products. Our aim is to investigate the relationship between circulating levels of LBP, and various metabolic and inflammatory markers in HD patients. Besides, we also aim to determine its relationship am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with previous studies which proposed LBP as a sensitive serum biomarker to evaluate RA course in active RA patients, considering that LBP was significantly correlated with RA disease activity parameters [28][29][30]. Concerning its post translational modification, LBP hold four known sites of N-glycosylation whose function remains unexplained [66,73]. We observed in ERA a significant decrease of glycosylated LBP level compared to controls, which was, as observed for CBG, reverted after 12 months-period of treatment.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in agreement with previous studies which proposed LBP as a sensitive serum biomarker to evaluate RA course in active RA patients, considering that LBP was significantly correlated with RA disease activity parameters [28][29][30]. Concerning its post translational modification, LBP hold four known sites of N-glycosylation whose function remains unexplained [66,73]. We observed in ERA a significant decrease of glycosylated LBP level compared to controls, which was, as observed for CBG, reverted after 12 months-period of treatment.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…LBP is an acute-phase protein which binds LPS, a glycolipid present on the membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Therefore, LBP appears to be directly involved in the recognition of pathogenic bacteria, delivers endotoxin and enhances LPS-mediated cytokine induction [66,67]. Indeed, the complex between LPS and LBP binds to CD14 receptor promoting the production of cytokines through the activation of TLR4 signalling [68,69].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the interaction and correlation analysis, we discovered the possible pro‐inflammatory effects of MTB proteins on the body and weakened host's protective immune response against MTB. There was a positive correlation between the protein abundance of sCD14 and LBP, which has been observed in chronic inflammation patients as well 29 . The sCD14 abundance also showed a low‐positive correlation to restriction endonuclease S subunit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…There was a positive correlation between the protein abundance of sCD14 and LBP, which has been observed in chronic inflammation patients as well. 29 The sCD14 abundance also showed a low-positive correlation to restriction endonuclease S subunit. Compared with the DS-TB group, the abundance of restriction endonuclease S subunit tended to be up-regulated in the MDR-TB group, indicating that the virulent MTB complex could strongly resist the host immune response during infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In each case, we compared several intestinal and systemic health outcomes in pelargonidin-treated subjects to control animals receiving saline gavages (17). Treated mice did not lose weight during the study (Fig 5i) nor did they experience elevated blood levels of the intestinal inflammation markers lipopolysaccharide binding protein (33) (LBP, Fig 5j), intestinal fatty acid binding protein (34,35) (I-FABP, Fig 5k), or procalcitonin (35) (PCT, Fig 5l). Further, gene expression analysis of mice's small intestinal epithelia revealed no significant changes in the expression of the pore-forming tight junction protein Claudin 2 (8) (CLDN2, Fig 5m) or the barrier-forming proteins Claudin 3 (CLDN3, Fig 5n), Zonula Occludens 1 (ZO-1, Fig 5p) (36).…”
Section: Mucoadhesive Intestinal Patchesmentioning
confidence: 99%