2015
DOI: 10.5582/bst.2015.01170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum expression levels of miR-17, miR-21, and miR-92 as potential biomarkers for recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In colorectal cancer, Expression of miR-17, miR-21 and miR-92 were significantly higher in serum of patients with disease relapse. Thus serum miR-21, miR-17, and miR-92 expression in colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy may have diagnostic value in the differentiation between recurred and non-recurred patients [39]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In colorectal cancer, Expression of miR-17, miR-21 and miR-92 were significantly higher in serum of patients with disease relapse. Thus serum miR-21, miR-17, and miR-92 expression in colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy may have diagnostic value in the differentiation between recurred and non-recurred patients [39]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serum miRNA-365 expression correlates with overall survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer [15]. Serum expression levels of miRNA-17, miRNA-21, and miRNA-92 predict recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer patients [16]. Serum miRNA-183 can be used to predict the response of renal cell carcinoma cells to the cytotoxicity induced by natural killer cells [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study evaluated the diagnostic role of miR-29a and the related combination markers in the recurrence of CRC. In the study, miR-29a could discriminate recurred patients from non-recurred stage III CRC patients with a sensitivity of 50.0%, a specificity of 42.9% and the AUC of 0.452 while the combination markers (miR-29a, miR-92, miR-17 and miR-21) increased the diagnostic power for the patients, yielding an AUC of 0.881, with a sensitivity of 83.3% and a specificity of 85.7% (P < 0.05) [41]. In another study, the sensitivity of miR-29a for identifying recurrence in CRC was 31.0%, the specificity was 98.0% [42].…”
Section: Recurrence Prediction Value Of Mir-29 and The Combination Mamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…After manually screening the titles, abstracts and keywords and then checking the full texts, 9 articles involving 10 studies for individual miR-29 and 5 articles containing 6 studies for miRNA combination markers based on miR-29 that met the inclusion norm were finally selected for the diagnostic meta-analysis while six publications including eight studies evaluating the survival outcome were identified eligible in the prognostic meta-analysis [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Moreover, three studies assessed the roles of miR-29 and miRNA combination markers in the recurrence prediction of CRC and one study evaluated the biomarker role in the metastasis prediction in CRC [40][41][42][43]. The characteristics of the eligible studies were summarized in Tables 1, 2 and 3.…”
Section: Study Identification and Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%