2019
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2019.1609053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum Biomarkers of Iron Status and Risk of Primary Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Serum biomarkers of iron status and risk of primary liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in line with abundant data from observational and experimental studies, indicating carcinogenic effects of high iron levels on liver cancer. In a recent meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies, serum ferritin (6 studies) and serum iron (3 studies) levels in the highest category were associated with 1.5-and 2.5-fold increases in risk of liver cancer, respectively, when compared to levels in the lowest group [9]. Moreover, high transferrin saturation (≥60% versus <50%) was reported to be associated with a significant 5.9-fold higher risk of liver cancer in a prospective cohort of 8763 Danish adults followed up for 15 years [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are in line with abundant data from observational and experimental studies, indicating carcinogenic effects of high iron levels on liver cancer. In a recent meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies, serum ferritin (6 studies) and serum iron (3 studies) levels in the highest category were associated with 1.5-and 2.5-fold increases in risk of liver cancer, respectively, when compared to levels in the lowest group [9]. Moreover, high transferrin saturation (≥60% versus <50%) was reported to be associated with a significant 5.9-fold higher risk of liver cancer in a prospective cohort of 8763 Danish adults followed up for 15 years [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A randomized trial of 1277 individuals with peripheral arterial disease (636 in iron reduction group through venesection and 641 in control group) found that in the iron reduction group, who received regular phlebotomy, the risk of overall cancer, cancer-specific mortality and all-cause mortality was lower than in the control group after 4.5 years of follow-up [4]. However, findings of observational studies are inconsistent or scarce concerning the effects of iron status on individual cancers, such as colorectal, breast and oesophagal cancer [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Consequently, whether iron status (which is routinely measured in clinical practice as serum iron, transferrin saturation, ferritin and transferrin) plays a role in the development of site-specific cancer remains inconclusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, SF is widely used as a surrogate marker of iron stores. In addition to this, SF has been found to be elevated in patient with inflammation, liver disease, and malignancy . Moreover, previous studies have suggested that high SF is associated with poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, peripheral T‐cell lymphoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition to this, SF has been found to be elevated in patient with inflammation, liver disease, and malignancy. [8][9][10][11] Moreover, previous studies have suggested that high SF is associated with poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, peripheral T-cell lymphoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma. [12][13][14][15][16] Therefore, ferritin may not only function as a marker of iron stores, but may also aid in clinical decision-making, including diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and/or patient management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the lung, increased levels of lipocalin are associated with radio-responsiveness and this protein could serve as an early-stage biomarker [89,90]. Direct measurements of serum Fe concentration were evaluated for possible association with cancer, however, results were not always consistent between studies [91][92][93][94].…”
Section: Iron and Fe-proteins As Cancer Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%