1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4017(98)00260-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum antibody response of Castellana sheep to Haemonchus contortus infection and challenge:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…But in contrast to studies in Texel and Castellana sheep showing a stronger IgG and IgA response in animals previously exposed to infection (Schallig et al, 1995;Gomez-Munoz et al, 1999), in Creole kids naturally parasitized on pasture before the experimental infection, a weak response was observed except for IgA anti-ESP which showed amounts similar to primo-infected sheep. Previous studies in sheep suggest that IgA may be the major mechanism controlling fecundity of H. contortus and worm length and fecundity of Teladorsagia cicumcincta (Stear et al, 1995b;Strain et al, 2002 (Amarante et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…But in contrast to studies in Texel and Castellana sheep showing a stronger IgG and IgA response in animals previously exposed to infection (Schallig et al, 1995;Gomez-Munoz et al, 1999), in Creole kids naturally parasitized on pasture before the experimental infection, a weak response was observed except for IgA anti-ESP which showed amounts similar to primo-infected sheep. Previous studies in sheep suggest that IgA may be the major mechanism controlling fecundity of H. contortus and worm length and fecundity of Teladorsagia cicumcincta (Stear et al, 1995b;Strain et al, 2002 (Amarante et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Eosinophil, mast cell, and globule leukocyte recruitments were apparent at 7, 15 and 28 dpc respectively in primaryinfected animals while these cells were still present in previously-infected lambs at 3 dpc. Antibody responses were delayed and low in primary-infected lambs and rapid and higher in previously-infected ones as previously shown by Schallig et al [30] and Gomez-Munoz et al [16]. Consequently, while final response intensities were similar in both infected groups, recruitment of cells and secretion of immunoglobulins in previously-infected sheep were observed before their occurrence in primary-infected sheep.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The finding of this experiment is in contrast to previous studies in sheep that there is normally an increase in peripheral antibodies in animals previously exposed to GIN infection (Schallig et al, 1995;Gómez-Muñoz et al, 1999). The discrepancy is likely due to goats and sheep having developed their own strategies to regulate GIN infection, based on immune mechanism and feeding behaviours .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%